华东师范大学(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (3): 108-118.doi: 10.16382/ j.cnki.1000-5579.2016.03.012

• 哲学、科学与逻辑 • 上一篇    下一篇

论冯契的中国古代逻辑研究

晋荣东   

  1. 华东师范大学,上海 200241
  • 出版日期:2016-05-15 发布日期:2016-07-06
  • 通讯作者: 晋荣东
  • 作者简介:晋荣东
  • 基金资助:

    本文系国家社科基金重大项目“冯契哲学文献整理及思想研究”(15ZDB012)的阶段性成果?

On Feng Qi's Study of Logic in Ancient China

JIN Rong-Dong   

  • Online:2016-05-15 Published:2016-07-06
  • Contact: JIN Rong-Dong
  • About author:JIN Rong-Dong

摘要: 冯契在20世纪70年代末80年代初已对中国古代逻辑及其相关问题进行了深入研究?他论证了中国古代有逻辑;援引逻辑思维的基本矛盾证成了逻辑多元论;认为中国古代较早发展了朴素的辩证逻辑而长期冷落形式逻辑;通过对“三物”论说的创造性诠释提出了以“类”“故”“理”为骨架的逻辑范畴体系;并对中国古代逻辑研究的方法论进行了系统反思?冯契的这些理论创获与方法论自觉对于深化中国古代逻辑研究具有重要的意义?

Abstract: Feng Qi had made a thorough study of logic in ancient China during the late 1970s and early 1980s. He not only argues that there is logic in ancient China, but makes a justification for the pluralism of logic from the perspective of basic contradiction of logical thinking. Influenced by Joseph Needham, he holds that the ancient Chinese showed a constant tendency to develop naive dialectical logic rather than formal logic. By creatively interpreting the ancient discourse on "Three Things (三物)", he sketches a new system of logical categories which takes lei (类/class), gu (故/reason) and li (理/principle) as its basic skeleton. Besides these concrete studies, he also makes a systematic reflection on the methodological issues about the study of logic in ancient China. Feng Qi's such academic achievements will play an important role in the further study of logic in ancient China.