Abstract:

The public housing of urban low-income groups is gradually aging. The double qualification of household registration status and housing welfare make them not simply weak in the process of gaming with the local government. Although only having the "insufficient" residence right, the low-income groups, based on the public housing community location superiority to seek the housing power maximization, "kidnaps" the government no matter with the social morals public opinion or in terms of economic returns. The lack of land development in publicly owned housing communities in the short term makes the local government have less institutional motivation to govern the community of public housing, which is reflected on the fact that the investment in the community management, repair and maintenance of the public housing is negative.

Key words: urban public housing, domicile identity, governmental responsibility, behavioral logic