二战后台湾归还者长期开展各种活动，要求日本政府对他们在战败后失去的财产进行补偿。在归还者团体呼吁、国会活动与政府应对这三者的互动中，日本政府采取了多重标准的应对态度：一方面，对外不断寻求缔结特别协定的机会；另一方面，对国内，一边主张政府不负有必须进行补偿的法律义务，一边通过立法给归还者们发放特别补贴作为最终的解决方法，并以"国民忍受论"作为思想工具以求宁人息事。日本政府犯下的侵略罪行，它的国民是否需要"忍受"，这个问题在今天的日本仍然不断地被质问。

After the World War II,the returners from Taiwan had carried out various activities,requiring the Japanese government to make compensations for their lost properties during the war. In the interaction between the appeal of the returners,parliament activities and the government's response,the Japanese government adopted different standards. On the one hand,it sought the opportunities of reaching special agreements with foreign countries;on the other hand,it declared the government's having no legal obligation to compensate,gave special subsidies to angry returners through legislation as the final solution,and used the doctrine of the "bearing spirit of citizens" as an intellectual tool to stop the crisis. Whether Japanese people should bear the invasion crime that the Japanese government committed has always been questioned.