中西中古赋税理论比较研究

试析中世纪英国税收理论*

  • 施诚
展开
  • 首都师范大学 历史系, 北京 100037
施诚(1964—), 男, 江西吉水人, 首都师范大学历史系副教授, 历史学博士

收稿日期: 2006-10-17

  网络出版日期: 2007-01-29

An Analysis of Taxation Theory in Medieval England

  • Cheng SHI
Expand
  • Department of History, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100037, China)

Received date: 2006-10-17

  Online published: 2007-01-29

摘要

在封君封臣制度下, 中世纪英国国王具有全国最高封君和国君的双重身份。作为最高封建主, 国王应该“靠自己过活”, 即以来自王领的“正常收入”维持王室生活和日常行政开支, 但是经常入不敷出。于是国王以国君身份, 以“共同利益”和“共同需要”为由, 向全国臣民征收动产税———特别收入, 以满足日益增长的行政和军事开支。议会通过充当“共同利益”的判断者取得批税权, 推动了中世纪英国宪政的发展。

关键词: 中世纪; 英国; 税收; 理论

本文引用格式

施诚 . 试析中世纪英国税收理论*[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2007 , 39(1) : 10 -15 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2007.01.003

Abstract

Influenced by the lord-vassal system, a king of medieval England had dual identities: supreme lord and monarch.As a supreme lord, the king should"live on his own, "that is, he should live on his ordinary income derived from crown lands.But the ordinary income was often hard to sufficiently satisfy his needs.Hence, the king levied personal taxes on his subjects on the pretence of "common good"and "common need"so as to meet with ever increasing administrative and military expenditures.The Parliament seized the power to authorize moveable taxes by acting as the judge of "common good", thus facilitating the constitutional development of medieval England.

参考文献

1 施诚, 2003, 《论中古英国"国王靠自己过活"的原则》, 《世界历史》 第1期。
2 B. P. Wolffe, The Crown Lands, London, 1970.
3 James H. Ramsay, A History of the Revenues of the Kings of Eng-land, 1066—1399, volume 1, Oxford University Press, 1925.
4 James H. Ramsay, A History of the Revenues of the Kings of Eng-land, 1066—1399, volume 2, Oxford University Press, 1925.
5 S. K. Mitchell, Studies in Taxation under John and Henry III, Yale University Press, 1914.
6 M. Prestwich, War, Politics and Finance under Edward I, Lon-don, 1972.
7 Natlie Fryde, The Tyranny and Fall of Edward II, Cambridge Uni-versity Press, 1979.
8 A. L. Brown, The Governance of Late Medieval England 1272—1461, Stanford University Press, 1989.
9 Charles Ross, Edward IV, London, 1983.
10 Richard Mortimer, Angevin England, Massachusetts, 1994.
11 E. F. Jacob, The fifteenth Century, Oxford University Press, 1961.
12 B. E. V. Sabine, A Short History of Taxation, London, 1980.
13 E. H. Kantorowicz, The King's Two Bodies, Princeton UniversityPress, 1957.
14 R. S. Hoyt, The Royal Demesne in the English Constitutional History, New York, 1968.
15 F. Pollack & F. W. Maitland, History of English Law before the Time of Edward I, volume 1, London, 1923.
16 H. W. C. Davis, England under the Normans and Angevins, Lon-don, 1928.
17 D. C. Douglas, English Historical Documents, volume 2, Lon-don, reprinted in 2001.
18 A. P. D'Entreves edited, Translated by J. G. Dawson, Selected Political Writings, Oxford, 1948.
19 J. L. Bolton, The Medieval English Economy 1150—1500, Lon-don, 1980.
20 Joseph Canning, A History of Medieval Political Thought 300—1450, London, 1996.
21 G. L. Harriss, King, Parliament and Public Finance in Medieval England to 1369, Oxford, 1975.
22 W. Stubbs, Selected Charters, Oxford, Clarendon, 1895.
23 M. Ormrod, The Reign of Edward III, Yale University Press, 1990.
24 M. Jurkowski, Lay Taxes in England and Wales 1188—1688, PRO Publications, 1998.
25 M. Ormrod, Political Life in Medieval England 1300—1450, NewYork, St. Martin s Press Inc., 1995.
26 S. K. Mitchell, Taxation in Medieval England, Archon Books, 1971.
27 M. V. Clarke, Medieval Representation and Consent, New York, reprinted in 1964.
28 D. C. Douglas, English Historical Documents, volume 3, Lon-don, reprinted in 2001.
Options
文章导航

/