华东师范大学(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2013, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 95-101.

• 政治学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

超越“二元困境”
 ——马克思的社会结构分析及其方法论特征

杜玉华   

  1. 华东师范大学社科部,上海,200062
  • 出版日期:2013-07-15 发布日期:2013-09-09
  • 通讯作者: 杜玉华
  • 作者简介:杜玉华
  • 基金资助:

    本文系国家社科基金项目2013年度课题(13BSH002)、教育部人文社会科学研究项目(13JJD840009)以及教育部全国高校优秀中青年思政课教师择优计划项目“大学生马克思主义理论思维能力培养研究”的阶段性成果之一。

Transcending the “Dualistic Predicaments”: Marx’s Analysis of Social Structure and Its Methodological Feature

DU Yu-hua   

  • Online:2013-07-15 Published:2013-09-09
  • Contact: DU Yu-hua
  • About author:DU Yu-hua

摘要: 结构分析是马克思解开“历史之谜”,开创社会结构理论的一个极为重要的方法论建构。但遗憾的是,长期以来,在西方形形色色的社会结构理论分析中,一直存在着各种各样的“二元对立”的困境,致使社会结构分析方法尽管被大量地运用,但实际上却一直未能形成科学而有效的方法论传统。对此,我们应该重新回到马克思的经典传统之中,通过对马克思社会结构分析及其方法论特征的梳理,发现马克思的结构分析方法具有整体性与个体性、抽象性与具体性、稳定性与动态性、客观性与主观性相统一的方法论特征,而这种方法论特征恰恰是超越传统的二元困境的有效探索。

Abstract: Structural analysis is an important construction for Marx to solve the “historical puzzle” and create his theory of social structure. Unfortunately, for a long time, there have been various predicaments of “binary oppositions” in all kinds of Western theoretical analyses of social structure. As a result, although the analysis of social structure was used widely, a tradition of scientific and efficient methodologies has not been formed in fact. In this regard, we should return to Marxist classical tradition. By studying Marx’s analysis of social structure, we find that Marx’s method of structural analysis, which is characterized by the unity of totality and individuality, abstractness and concreteness, stability and dynamic, objectivity and subjectivity, will help us transcend traditional predicaments of “binary oppositions”.