华东师范大学(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2014, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 75-86.

• 政治学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

施特劳斯与政治哲学的两个路向

吴冠军   

  1. 华东师范大学政治学系
  • 出版日期:2014-09-15 发布日期:2014-10-02
  • 通讯作者: 吴冠军
  • 作者简介:吴冠军
  • 基金资助:

    本文系国家社会科学基金项目“当代激进左翼政治哲学研究”(13CZX059)及上海市浦江人才项目“‘后结构主义’之后的政治哲学”(12PJC036)的阶段性成果。

Leo Strauss and Two Directions in Political Philosophy

WU Guan-jun   

  • Online:2014-09-15 Published:2014-10-02
  • Contact: WU Guan-jun
  • About author:WU Guan-jun

摘要: 利奥•施特劳斯是晚近十余年汉语政治哲学关注的焦点人物,他提出的现代性批判视角与复兴古典政治哲学的努力,已激起大量讨论。施氏同时给其政治哲学贴上“苏格拉底式”与“柏拉图式”的标签,然而,这师徒二人当年恰恰开启了政治哲学的两个相反路向。施特劳斯在两个路向之间的诸种艰苦游移及其最终隐在取向,便成为了一个极具思想史价值的经典个案。通过细致剖析此学案,我们可以进一步追索出政治哲学从其古希腊创基性时期到当代欧陆激进政治哲学之间的内在脉络。

关键词: 施特劳斯, 拉克劳, 自然正确, 最好政制, 大他者

Abstract: Leo Strauss has occupied the focal point of Sinophone circles of political philosophy for over a decade. His critique of modernity and effort to resuscitate classical political philosophy has attracted heated discussions. Strauss labels his political philosophy as both “Socratic” and “Platonic.” However, what Socrates and Plato have opened up are two opposite directions in political philosophy. Strauss’s subtle oscillation between these two directions is a case worthy of deep analysis. By virtue of such analysis, we are able to further trace the inner lineage from ancient Greek political philosophy to contemporary continental radical political philosophy.