华东师范大学(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (3): 171-173.doi: 10.16382/ j.cnki.1000-5579.2016.03.019

• 对话桑德尔 • 上一篇    下一篇

从“比较式对话”到“合作式对话”
——对陈来等教授的回应与评论

[美]桑德尔   

  1. 哈佛大学哲学系,美国波士顿
  • 出版日期:2016-05-15 发布日期:2016-07-06
  • 通讯作者: [美]桑德尔
  • 作者简介:[美]桑德尔

From “Comparative Dialogue” to “Collaborative Dialogue”: Comments on and Responses to Professor CHEN Lai

Sandall   

  • Online:2016-05-15 Published:2016-07-06
  • Contact: Sandall
  • About author:Sandall

摘要: 在对陈来《关于桑德尔共和主义德行的思考》的回应中,桑德尔指出,政治不能与伦理相分离,政治关乎个人德行的养成,这可以视作儒家传统与共和制传统之间的共识?在此意义上,桑德尔接受陈来的批评,同时他也向陈来提问,包括儒家怎样理解政治活动与个人德行之关系?在对“桑德尔与中国哲学”国际研讨会的总结性回应中,桑德尔阐发了自己研究工作中可能与儒家传统相关联的四个论题:反思西方流行的“无负荷的自我”观念,良好生活的观念,政治与德行,以及自然问题?桑德尔主张,学界的跨文化对话可由当前的“比较式对话”向“合作式对话”迈进,期待对话双方更深地介入文本和彼此的思想传统?

关键词: 儒家丨共和主义丨德行丨&ldquo, 比较式对话&rdquo, 丨&ldquo, 合作式对话&rdquo

Abstract: In the comments on Prof. CHEN Lais paper On Sanders Idea of Republican Virtues, Sander argues Confucian tradition and republic tradition will agree that politics cannot be separated from ethics, and politics is concerned about the cultivation of virtues. In this sense, Sander accepts Chens critics. But he also raises some questions to Chen, including the relationship between politics and personal virtue in Confucian tradition. In the conclusive responses on the International Symposium of “Sander and Chinese Philosophy”, Sander introduces four themes, which may have connection with the Confucian tradition, i.e. reflecting the dominant understanding of an “unencumbered self”, the idea of good life, politics and virtue, and nature. He suggests to move from current “comparative dialogue” to “collaborative dialogue” in the international communication so that different traditions can have a better mutual understanding of their central texts and ways of thinking.

Key words: Confucian, republicanism, virtue, &ldquo, collaborative dialogue&rdquo, , &ldquo, comparative dialogue&rdquo