华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2023, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (4): 26-36.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2023.04.003

• 中国史研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

“御夷狄”与“通财用”:中国古代海外贸易的政策取向

黄纯艳   

  • 接受日期:2023-06-21 出版日期:2023-07-15 发布日期:2023-08-01
  • 作者简介:黄纯艳,华东师范大学历史学系教授(上海,200241)
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金重大项目“中国古代财政体制变革与地方治理模式演变”(项目编号:17ZDA175)

“Defending against Barbarians” and “Acquiring Economic Needs through Trade”:The Policymaking Tendency of Overseas Trade in Ancient China

Chun-yan HUANG   

  • Accepted:2023-06-21 Online:2023-07-15 Published:2023-08-01

摘要:

更深入地认识中国古代海外贸易政策的性质,需要克服“开放—封闭”二元判断的局限,揭示政策的历史逻辑。华夷观念和天下秩序的绝对原则决定了海外贸易政策首先是“御夷狄”的取向,也使中国古代王朝不可能与海外诸国发展出国家间的对等贸易关系。中国与海外诸国互补性经济需求使海外贸易政策又有“通财用”的取向,且不断增强,从以物品消费需求为主逐步发展到以财政需求为主。宋代以后,东南沿海地区海洋性地域特征日益显现,亚洲海洋贸易迅猛发展,成为内外动力,推动海洋贸易政策总体上不断走向开放、专门化和系统化。从汉唐到清朝前期,海外贸易政策始终是华夷理念和朝贡体制下的“御夷狄”和“通财用”,有量的增长而无质的变革。这一量的积累与船坚炮利的西方势力和不同国际关系规则的全球化浪潮交互作用,使清朝逐步改变既有轨道,被动接受新的体制和观念。

关键词: 中国古代, 海外贸易政策, 历史逻辑, “御夷狄”, “通财用”

Abstract:

In order to comprehend the nature of overseas trade policy in ancient China, one needs to overcome the limitation of judging it by the binarism of “opening up-closing off” and uncover its historical logic. The absolute principle of the Sino-barbarian dichotomy and the order of the world dictates that the overseas trade policy first and foremost gravitated towards “defending against barbarians”, which made equal trading relationships between ancient Chinese dynasties and overseas nations impossible. The complementary economic demands of China and overseas nations led to “acquiring economic needs through trade” in overseas trade policy - a trend that intensified and gradually prioritized financial demands over goods demand. After the Song Dynasty, south-eastern coastal regions’ maritime characteristics became increasingly prominent. Asian maritime trade developed rapidly and became an internal and external driving force that pushed maritime trade policy towards openness, professionalization, and systematization. From the Han Dynasty and the Tang Dynasty to the early period of the Qing Dynasty, overseas trade policy had always adhered to “defending against barbarians” and “acquiring economic needs through trade” under the notion of Sino- barbarian dichotomy and the tributary system, which led to quantitative increase but no qualitative reform. Through the mutual interactions between this quantitative accumulation and the militarily advanced Western powers, as well as different rules of international relations, the Qing Dynasty was made to gradually change its pre-existing course and passively accept new systems and concepts.

Key words: ancient China, overseas trade policy, historical logic, “defending against barbarians”, “acquiring economic needs through trade”