华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2003, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 35-41.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2003.05.007

• 哲学 法政 • 上一篇    下一篇

朝鲜核危机与美国及东亚主要国家的立场分析

周敏凯   

  • 收稿日期:2003-06-27 出版日期:2003-09-01 发布日期:2025-12-19
  • 作者简介:周敏凯(1949-), 男, 上海市人, 华东师范大学国际问题研究所教授, 博士生导师

A Comparative Study of America's and Major East-Asia States' Positions on the DPRK Nuclear Crisis

Min-kai ZHOU   

  • Received:2003-06-27 Online:2003-09-01 Published:2025-12-19

摘要:

朝鲜核危机由来已久。20世纪90年代和去年10月以来发生的两次核危机, 引发朝鲜半岛与东亚地区的严重安全问题。对此问题, 东亚地区主要国家的态度迥异。韩国坚持和平解决危机立场, 也不排斥必要时采取强硬手段; 日本主张采取强硬措施; 中国政府则坚持多方会谈、和平解决危机。美国克林顿政府与小布什政府的立场不尽相同, 在美国对伊拉克战争期间, 小布什已制定基本政策。事态发展令人关注。

关键词: 朝鲜核危机, 主要国家, 立场, 分析比较

Abstract:

The DPRK nuclear crisis has initiated a severe security trouble in the Korean peninsula and East-Asia area since October 2002. The crisis has existed for a long time. Towards this problem, the attitudes of main countries in the area are quite different. The position of the U. S. Bush administration is also quite different from that of the Clinton administration. The Bush administration already made its fundamental policy to the issue during the Iraq War. South Korea sticks to its position of peacefully dealing with the crisis, and is not necessarily at odds with tough means at a pinch. Japan stands for adopting a tough policy for the crisis. The Chinese government maintains multilateral talks to resolve the crisis peacefully. The world is paying close attention to the situational development.

Key words: the DPRK nuclear crisis, positions of major countries, analysis and comparison

中图分类号: