华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (2): 36-45.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2026.02.004

• 冯契哲学思想研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

多重表征的事实:金岳霖与冯契事实观的理论挑战及当代展开

阮凯   

  • 接受日期:2026-02-11 出版日期:2026-03-15 发布日期:2026-03-31
  • 作者简介:阮凯,中山大学哲学系(珠海)副教授(珠海,519082)
  • 基金资助:
    广东省哲学社会科学规划一般项目“AI驱动的科学实践对科学哲学经典理论的挑战与革新研究”(项目编号:GD26CZX01)。

Multiple Representations of Facts:Theoretical Challenges and Contemporary Developments of Jin Yuelin and Feng Qi’s Views on Facts

Kai Ruan   

  • Accepted:2026-02-11 Online:2026-03-15 Published:2026-03-31

摘要:

知识论旨在反思人类知识的基础性问题,而科学知识是人类知识的代表性形态。金岳霖与冯契对知识论的研究,既体现了对当时科学实践的重视,同时也为我们理解人类知识提供了原创性的中国思想。事实研究在金冯的知识论中占据核心地位,但随着人类认知方式和科学实践的发展,金冯事实观面临新的理论挑战,以三方面问题最为关键:事实与认识的关系问题、事实与理论的关系问题,以及AI参与事实发现带来的新认识论问题。为回应上述挑战,我们有必要重新挖掘金岳霖区分知识对象与知识内容的理论意义,通过区分客观实存的事实与认知加工的事实,提出多重表征的事实观。这一工作既能展现金冯知识论的理论价值,也能作为范例来推动金冯知识论的当代展开。

关键词: 科学实践, 知识的对象与内容, AI参与的事实发现, 客观实存的事实, 认知加工的事实

Abstract:

The theory of knowledge is devoted to reflecting reflect on the fundamental issues of human knowledge, while scientific knowledge is the representative form of human knowledge. Jin Yuelin and Feng Qi’s theory of knowledge not only demonstrates a sustained engagement with the scientific practices of their time, but also provides original Chinese philosophical resources for understanding human knowledge. In their theory of knowledge, the examination of facts occupies a central position. As human cognitive methods and scientific practices have evolved, however, their views on facts faces new theoretical challenges, particularly in three following aspects: the relation between fact and cognition, the relation between fact and theory, and the new epistemological issues due to the involvement of AI in fact finding. To address these challenges, this paper reexamines the theoretical significance of Jin Yuelin’s distinction between the object and the content of knowledge. By distinguishing objectively existing fact from cognitively processed fact, it proposes a conception of fact as multiple representations. This work will not only show the theoretical value of Jin and Feng’s theory of knowledge, but also serve as an example to promote the contemporary development of their theory.

Key words: scientific practices, the object and the content of knowledge, the involvement of AI in fact finding, objectively existing fact, cognitively processed fact