城镇化与城市发展研究

住房政策目标双重属性与市场稳定

  • 崔光灿
展开
  • 上海师范大学商学院 上海 200234
崔光灿,经济学博士,上海师范大学商学院教授(上海,200234)。

网络出版日期: 2018-01-26

基金资助

国家自然科学基金"住房保障家庭福利依赖及经济自助行为研究"(项目编号:71473166);上海师范大学产业经济学重点学科建设项目。

Market Stability and the Two Attributes of the Objective of Housing Policy

  • CUI Guang-can
Expand

Online published: 2018-01-26

摘要

住房政策目标从促进住房安全、公平的社会属性开始,转化为兼有促进经济增长的经济属性,并在后来较长一段时间内过于强化其经济属性。提高住房自有率的政策措施同时满足了两种目标属性的需要,使住房建设、住房消费与住房市场调控也越来越服务于经济目标。经济增长与宏观调控过度依赖住房市场,家庭资产配置过多依赖住房,住房政策目标侧重点在两种属性间的摆动,将会造成住房市场不稳定、不平衡的发展,使住房市场的阶段性波动加大。不稳定的住房市场既损害住房政策目标的实现,也带来了社会经济问题。通过使住房更多回归居住功能,形成侧重社会属性的市场干预政策,建立多渠道的住房支持体系,使非居住房地产服务于宏观调控,促使住房市场稳定,可使住房政策目标能更好地兼顾其社会、经济的双重属性,实现全体人民住有所居。

本文引用格式

崔光灿 . 住房政策目标双重属性与市场稳定[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018 , 50(1) : 149 -155 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2018.01.013

Abstract

In addition to its social attribute of emphasizing the promotion of housing security and fairness,the objective of housing policy has attained its economic attribute of accelerating economic development,which has ultimately become dominant.The housing policy of promoting the rate of homeownership meets these two attributes,making housing construction,consumption and regulation fit the economic attribute.If economic growth and macro-regulation relies too much on housing market,family asset is assigned too much to housing,and housing policy shifts between its two attributes,then the development of housing market would be instable and unbalanced,aggravating market fluctuations.Unstable housing market not only hinders the achievement of the objective of housing policy,but also causes social and economic problems.Government should emphasize more on social attribute in housing control policy and construct housing assistance system in multiple channels.Consequently,non-residential property can work for macroeconomic regulation and control to promote the stability of housing market,keep the two attributes of the objective of housing policy in balance and achieve the ideal housing for all residents.

参考文献

阿列克斯·施瓦兹,2008,《美国住房政策》,黄瑛译,北京:中信出版社。
李健正,2010,《住房政策、住房自有与资产建设:东亚社会政策的一种新视角》,《公共行政评论》第3期。
李健正、肖棣文,2009,《社会政策视角下的香港住房政策:积极不干预主义的悖论》,《公共行政评论》第6期。
李娜、石敏俊、周晟吕,2012,《房地产投资变化对中国经济的影响》,《管理评论》第10期。
李艳玲,2003,《20世纪30年代美国城市公有住房建设初探》,《华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》第4期。
孟钟捷,2011,《德国历史上的住房危机与住房政策(1918-1924)——兼论住房统制模式的有效性与有限性》,《华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》第2期。
魏巍贤、原鹏飞,2009,《住房价格上涨的金融支持及检验——基于VEC模型的实证分析》,《财贸研究》第2期。
张清勇、郑环环,2012,《中国住宅投资引领经济增长吗?》,《经济研究》第2期。
朱亚鹏,2008,《中国住房保障政策分析——社会政策视角》,《公共行政评论》第4期。
Apgar W.,1989,The State of the Nation's Housing:An Update,Cambridge, MA:Joint Center for Housing Studies.
Brian J.M.,2013,"Are Homeowners Better Citizens? Homeownership and Community Participation in the United States",Social Forces,Vol.91,No.3.
Butler S.M.,1985,Privatizing Federal Spending,New York:Universe Books.
Forrest R. and Lee J.,2004,"Cohort Effects, Differential Accumulation and Hong Kong's Volatile Housing Market",Urban Studies, Vol.41,No.2.
Harkness J.M. and Newman S.J.,2003,"Effects of Homeownership on Children:The Role of Neighborhood Characteristics and Family Income",Economic Policy Review-Federal Reserve Bank of New York,No.9.
Howenstine E.,1957,"Appraising the Role of Housing in Economic Development",International Labour Review,Vol.75.
Leamer E., 2007,"Housing is the Business Cycle", NBER Working Paper, No.13428.
Turner T.M. and H.Luea,2009, "Homeownership, Wealth Accumulation and Income Status", Journal of Housing Economics, Vol.18.

文章导航

/