华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) >

2018 , Vol. 50 >Issue 5: 152 - 161

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2018.05.019

中国企业并购研究

公司并购支付方式与股票市场反应——来自中国上市公司的证据

  • 李明辉 ,
  • 吴小伟 ,
  • 周斌泉
展开
  • 1. 华东师范大学经济与管理学部 上海, 200241;
    2. 上海并购金融研究院 上海, 200062;
    3. 上海财经大学金融学院 上海, 200433
李明辉,金融学博士,华东师范大学经济与管理学部晨晖学者、金融学系讲师、应用经济学博士后流动站在职博士后(上海,200241),上海并购金融研究院研究员(上海,200062);吴小伟,上海财经大学金融学院博士生(上海,200433);周斌泉,华东师范大学经济学院博士生(上海,200241)。

网络出版日期: 2018-09-19

基金资助

国家自然科学基金青年项目"混业经营背景下我国商业银行非利息业务发展及其影响研究"（项目编号：71603085）；中国博士后科学基金第60批面上项目一等资助"我国商业银行流动性创造影响因素分析"（项目编号：2016M600292）；中国博士后科学基金第10批特别资助"中国银行业净稳定融资比率的部分调整模型分析"（项目编号：2017T100280）；上海并购金融研究院决策咨询课题"并购金融中商业银行的功能与定位研究"。

收起

Corporate M&A Payment Method and Stock Market Reaction: Evidence from China's Listed Companies

  • LI Ming-hui ,
  • WU Xiao-wei ,
  • ZHOU Bin-quan
Expand

Online published: 2018-09-19

Fold

摘要

采用事件研究的方法就我国上市公司1999年至2017上半年并购重组中不同支付方式的股票二级市场收益率反应进行研究，结果发现：（1）无论是现金支付、股票和资产支付还是混合支付都能为我国上市公司重大资产并购重组带来股票二级市场收益率的明显提升，存在显著的上市公司并购重组公告日效应。（2）股票和资产支付、混合支付的重大资产并购重组公告日效应会持续到公告日后的第6个交易日，现金支付的重大资产并购重组公告日效应只能持续到公告日后的第4个交易日。（3）从公告日后15个交易日的累积平均异常收益率来看，混合支付的累积平均异常收益率为0.242，要远高于股票和资产支付的0.216以及现金支付的0.108。（4）相较于国企，民企混合支付的累积平均异常收益率要更高、更显著。

关键词： 并购重组; 支付方式; 现金支付; 股票资产支付; 混合支付

本文引用格式

李明辉 , 吴小伟 , 周斌泉 . 公司并购支付方式与股票市场反应——来自中国上市公司的证据[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018 , 50(5) : 152 -161 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2018.05.019

Abstract

Using the event study method for the stocks returns of China's listed companies which have M&A activity during the period from the first half of 1999 to the first half of 2017,this paper finds that:(1) cash payments,equity and asset payment,or hybrid payment can significantly increase the secondary market stocks return for the major asset M&A of listed companies in China,and there is a significant daily effect of the announcement of M&A of listed companies in China;(2)the day-to-day announcement effect will continue until the 6th trading day after the announcement date. The daily effect of the announcement of major asset mergers and reorganizations of cash payment can only last 4 trading days after the announcement,while that of equity and asset payment or hybrid payment can last 6 trading days;(3)as for the cumulative abnormal returns (CAR)on the 15 trading days after the announcement,the CAR of hybrid payment is 0.242,which is much higher than that of equity and asset payment as 0.216 and that of cash payment as 0.108;(4)the CAR of hybrid payment of privately-owned companies is much higher and more obvious that that of state-owned enterprises.

Key words： acquisition and reorganization; payment methods; cash payment; equity and asset payment; hybrid payment

参考文献

陈涛、李善民,2011,《支付方式与收购公司财富效应》,《证券市场导报》第2期。
陈涛、李善民,2015,《并购支付方式的盈利能力支付计划探讨》,《证券市场导报》第9期。
葛结根,2015,《并购支付方式与并购绩效的实证研究——以沪深上市公司为收购目标的经验证据》,《会计研究》第9期。
葛伟杰、张秋生、张自巧,2014,《支付方式、融资约束与并购溢价研究》,《证券市场导报》第1期。
赵立新、蔡曼莉,陈晓洁,2012,《上市公司并购重组支付方式体系存在的问题及对策》,《证券市场导报》第8期。
Agrawal, A., Jaffe, J. F. and Mandelker, G. N., 1992, "The Post-Merger Performance of Acquiring Firms:A Re-Examination of an Anomaly", Journal of Finance, Vol.47, No.4.
Andrade, G., Mitchell, M.and Stafford, E., 2001, "New Evidence and Perspectives on Mergers", Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol.15, No.2.
Basu, N., Dimitrova, L. and Paeglis, I., 2009, "Family Control and Dilution in Mergers", Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol.33, No.5.
Bruslerie, D.L.H., 2013, "Crossing Takeover Premiums and Mix of Payment:An Empirical Test of Contractual Setting in M&A Transactions", Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol.37, No.6.
Cornu, P. and Isakov, D., 2000, "The Deterring Role of the Medium of Payment in Takeover Contests:Theory and Evidence from the UK", European Financial Management, Vol.6, No.4.
Dong, M., Hirshleifer, D., Richardson, S. and Teoh, S.H., 2006, "Does Investor Misvaluation Drive the Takeover Market?" Journal of Finance, Vol.61, No.2.
Eckbo, B.E., Giammarino, R.M. and Heinkel, R.L., 1990, "Asymmetric Information and the Medium of Exchange in Takeovers", Review of Financial Studies, Vol.3, No.4.
Eckbo, B.E. and Thorburn, K.S., 2000, "Gains to Bidder Firm Revisited Domestic and Foreign Acquisition in Canada", Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol.35, No.1.
Faccio, M. and Masulis, O.W., 2005, "The Choice of Payment Method in European Mergers and Acquisitions", Journal of Finance, Vol.60, No.3.
Fishman, M.J., 1989, "Preemptive Bidding and the Role of the Medium of Exchange in Acquisitions", Journal of Finance, Vol.44, No.1.
Ghosh, A. and Ruland, W., 1998, "Managerial Ownership, the Method of Payment for Acquisitions, and Executive Job Retention", Journal of Finance, Vol.53, No.2.
Ghosh, A., 2001, "Does Operating Performance Really Improve Following Corporate Acquisitions?" Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol.7, No.2.
Golubov, A., Petmezas, D. and Travlos, N.G., 2012, "When It Pays to Pay Your Investment Banker:New Evidence on the Role of Financial Advisors in M&As", Journal of Finance, Vol.67, No.1.
Hansen, R.G., 1987, "A Theory for the Choice of Exchange Medium in Mergers and Acquisitions", Journal of Business, Vol.60, No.1.
Stulz, R., 1988, "Managerial Control of Voting Rights:Financing Policies and the Market for Corporate Control", Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.20, No.3.
Travlos, N.G., 1987, "Corporate Takeover Bids, Methods of Payment, and Bidding Firms' Stock Returns", Journal of Finance, Vol.42, No.4.

Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉