"项目制"研究的吸引力和创新性在于其叙事结构的丰富性、生动性和对日常生活实践的深化阐释，这种过程分析的经验研究有效弥补了纯理论研究的抽象性和单一性。但是"项目治国"的过高定位，又导致后来研究者过度化、模式化应用，这一教条化的应用反过来扼杀了其自身的丰富性和多元化的特征。因此，这一研究如果要实现相关研究者的宏大抱负的话，多元研究范式的比较和反思性批判必不可少，而不是对相关领域自身研究视而不见。

The attraction and innovation of the research of "project system" lies in the abundance and activeness of its narrative structure and its deep elaboration on daily life practices. The research of process analyses makes up the abstraction and singularity of pure theoretical research effectively. However, the over orientation of "governing the state with projects" leads to researchers' over use and stereotyped application of the phrase and the dogmatic usage eliminates its abundance and diversity. Therefore, in order to realize the researchers' great aspirations, we should make the comparison of multiple research patterns and make reflective critiques instead of ignore the research of relative fields.