城镇化与城市发展

住房租赁体系:价值要素与“三元困境”

  • 严荣
展开
  • 上海市房地产科学研究院, 上海, 200031
严荣,上海市房地产科学研究院副院长,研究员(上海,200031)。

网络出版日期: 2020-05-22

基金资助

住房和城乡建设部决策咨询研究课题“完善我国住房租赁体系的对策研究”(项目编号:2020-ZXYJ-02)。

Rental Housing System: Value Elements and Trilemma

  • YAN Rong
Expand

Online published: 2020-05-22

摘要

工业化和城市化滥觞以来,住房政策主要关注三方面的价值要素:安全、可支付性和可获得性。经过快速发展和变迁,当前中国的住房租赁体系形成了以市场化租赁住房为主、非正规住房和保障性租赁住房为辅的格局。然而,非正规住房能满足可支付性和可获得性,却存在诸多安全隐患;市场化租赁住房能兼顾安全和可获得性,但可支付性较差;保障性租赁住房具有可支付性和安全方面的优点,但在可获得性方面较为欠缺。这三类住房都只能满足其中两种价值,而无法同时满足三种价值,从而形成了所谓的"三元困境"。为了促进我国住房租赁市场平稳健康可持续发展,当前应重点发展成本型租赁住房,强化包容性住房政策,加强对租赁住房的安全监管,规范租赁市场秩序,增强扶持政策的协同性。

本文引用格式

严荣 . 住房租赁体系:价值要素与“三元困境”[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020 , 52(3) : 160 -168 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2020.03.015

Abstract

Since the movement of industrialization and urbanization, affordability, security, and accessibility have been the three value elements concerned in housing policy. Through rapid development and change, rental housing system in current China has been composed by market-oriented rental housing, informal housing, and affordable rental housing. There are many security risks concerning informal housing although it meets affordability and accessibility. Market-oriented rental housing can balance security and accessibility, but it has poor affordability. Affordable rental housing has the advantages of affordability and security, but it is lacking in terms of accessibility. There is a so-called trilemma because any of the three types of housing can meet only two value elements rather than all of there. In order to promote the stable, healthy and sustainable development of the housing rental market, we should give priority to the development of cost-based rental housing, strengthen inclusive housing policy, intensify safety supervision for rental housing, and enhance the synergy of supportive policies.

参考文献

阿列克斯·施瓦茨,2012,《美国住房政策》(第二版),陈立中译,北京:中国社会科学出版社。
爱德华·L.格莱泽、约瑟夫·乔科,2012,《美国联邦住房政策反思》,陈立中、陈一方译,北京:中国建筑工业出版社。
宫志刚,2018,《平安北京建设发展报告(2018)》,北京:社会科学文献出版社。
洪银兴,2002,《市场秩序和市场规则》,《南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学)》第3期。
贾生华、戚文举,2010,《国外"房价收入比"研究:起源、测量与应用》,《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》第2期。
况伟大、丁言豪,2018,《中国城市居民住房支付能力时空分布研究——35个大中城市租金负担能力分析》,《价格理论与实践》第10期。
刘盛和、刘冉、赵美风,2018,《北京市流动人口聚居区与非正规住房市场研究》,北京:中国建筑工业出版社。
唐子来、张庭伟、张京祥、赵燕菁等,2016,《"包容性发展与城市规划变革"学术座谈会》,《城市规划学刊》第1期。
王宏哲,2008,《住房权研究》,北京:中国法制出版社。
余南平,2009,《欧洲社会模式——以欧洲住房政策和住房市场为视角》,上海:华东师范大学出版社。
张群,2009,《居有其屋:中国住房权历史研究》,北京:社会科学文献出版社。
张祚、陈昆仑、涂姗、刘艳中,2014,《中国城市居民住房来源构成与省际差异》,《世界地理研究》第9期。
赵静、闫小培、朱莹,2016,《深圳市城中村"非正规住房"空间特征与演化研究》,《地理科学》第12期。
Bullock, N. and Read, J., 2010, The Movement for Housing Reform in Germany and France, 1840-1914, New York:Cambridge University Press.
Hui, E.C.M., 2001, "Measuring Affordability in Public Housing from Economic Principles:Case Study of HongKong", Journal of Urban Planning and Development, Vol.127, No.1.
Lerman, D.L. and Reeder, W.J., 1987, "The Affordability of Adequate Housing", AREUEA Journal, Vol.15, No.4.
Linneman, P.D. and Megbolugbe, I.F., 1992, "Housing Affordability:Myth or Reality", Urban Studies, Vol.29, No.3.
McCrone, G. and Stephens, M., 1995, Housing Policy in Britain and Europe, London:UCL Press.
Somerville, P., 1998, "Explanations of Social Exclusion:Where does Housing Fit in?" Housing Studies, Vol.13, No.6.
Theodos, B., Pokin, S.J., Guernsey, E. and Getsinger, L., 2010, "Inclusive Public Housing:Services for the Hard to House", The Urban Institute Working Paper, No.16.
文章导航

/