1924—1926年间，正是五四与国民大革命两个时代之间的过渡期，在外部环境遽变的刺激之下，五四启蒙阵营内部发生了一波又一波的分化与冲突。现代评论派与语丝派由于在学术文化体制中的不同位置，形成了不同的“文化惯习”，发生了绅士与名士的论战。而在语丝派文人内部，周作人的名士风度与鲁迅的斗士性格也有微妙的差别。鲁迅因此联合激进青年另办《莽原》杂志。但后五四一代的狂飙派青年，高唱“新流氓主义”，企图打倒五四的老师一辈取而代之，掌控新的话语主导权。这几场论战形成的风气，为之后连绵不绝的“知识人内战”开创了恶性的范例。

During 1924-1926, China witnessed a transitional period between two key historical times from the May 4^th Period to the National Revolution. Under the stimulus of the drastically changing international environment, waves of discrepancies and conflicts took place in the enlightenment camp. The Modern Review camp and Yusi camp formed different cultural “customs” due to their different positions in the academic and cultural circle, and the conflicts between gentlemen and celebrated scholars broke out. Moreover, within the Yusi camp, ZHOU Zuo-ren’s disposition of a celebrated scholar and LU Xun’s character of a fighter had subtle differences. Thus, LU united radical youngsters to issue the journal of Mangyuan. The storm school comprised of youngsters in the post May 4^th Period highlighted the “New Idea of Hooligans”, who attempted to replace the generation of their teachers and master the discourse power. These waves of conflicts provided bad examples for later non-stop “civil war of scholars”.