认同冲突的频繁发生具有明显的现代性意义。然而，对认同冲突的政论阐述，无法为冲突之有效化解提供具有操作意义的具体方法。通过对认同冲突发生机制的细致辨析可以发现，认同冲突的化解机制与传统的建制化纠纷解决方法存在着明显区别，对认同冲突的处置需要在不同人、不同人群之间进行深度的对话而达致理解。在认同冲突的化解过程中，对话和理解不是抽象的理念或号召，而是一个从概念语词进入经验现场，从经验现场拓展结构意识，从结构意识实现人际同理的具体过程。该理论可以为认同冲突之化解提供步骤指引与方法依据，最终将认同冲突管理妥当。

The frequent occurrence of identity conflict has obvious modernity significance. The political-and-normative narratives, however, cannot provide operational guidance to identity conflict resolution. Through the in-depth analysis of the mechanism of identity conflict, it can be found that there are obvious differences between the resolution mechanism of identity conflict and the traditional institutionalized dispute resolution method. The resolution of identity conflict requires in-depth dialogue between different people and different groups to achieve mutual understanding. In this process, dialogue and understanding are not abstract ideas, but a concrete process from conceptual words to life experience exposure, from life experience exposure to structural consciousness, and from structural consciousness to interpersonal empathy. This theory can provide operational guidance and methodology for the resolution of identity conflict and eventually provides reasonable resolution to identity conflict.