非典（非典型肺炎，SARS）作为二十一世纪的第一场国际流行病引发了生命科学与社会科学的持续关注，相关研究与社会记忆仍从不同角度影响着当下的疫病叙述与个体日常经验。在综观社会科学领域内有关非典讨论的基础上，可以从理论对话的视角将这些研究归纳为以下五个面向：现代性与治理及日常抵抗、污名化与日常生活、疫病作为事件、疫病作为经验与记忆源泉，以及作为行动的社会科学，这些视角共同构筑了社会科学领域内关于疫病研究的叙事。此外，将非典研究视为梳理疫病研究脉络的切入口，可以构筑社会科学领域内疫病研究的理论与经验平台。

As the first pandemic in the 21^st century, SARS has been an ongoing focus for both life sciences and social sciences. It offers a privileged case study to investigate both the long-term social memory of past pandemics as well as the hiatus dividing collective narratives from the individuals’ everyday experiences. Based on a systematic literature review of studies devoted to the social impact of SARS, this paper identifies five major perspectives that have shaped the attempt to theorize SARS in social sciences: a critique on modernity and governmentality, stigmatization and everyday life, the pandemic as an event, the pandemic as a source of individual experiences and memories, and social sciences as action. All of these constitute the whole image of narratives about the pandemic. Taking SARS as a fundamental case, this paper aims to construct a theoretical and experiential framework for future research on pandemic studies.