“批判佛教”之批判

非中国化与非宗派化: 日本批判佛教论及其效应

  • 陈永革
展开
  • 浙江省社会科学院 哲学研究所,杭州 310025
陈永革(1966——),男,浙江永康人,浙江社会科学院哲学所副所长、研究员,哲学博士

收稿日期: 2005-12-04

  网络出版日期: 2006-03-30

De-sinicization and De-sectarization: Japanese Critical Buddhism and its Impact

  • Yongge CHEN
Expand
  • Institute of Philosophy Zhejiang Academy of Social Sciences, Hangzhou 310025, China

Received date: 2005-12-04

  Online published: 2006-03-30

摘要

中国佛教既有前宗派时期的格义佛教类型, 更有宗派佛教义学建构时期发挥重要作用的“证义”佛教类型。日本批判佛教论, 作为后宗派时代佛教思潮, 由于缺乏历史与文本的双重解读, 并未真正如实地评判如来藏—本觉思想在中国宗派佛教创建中(即“证义佛教”阶段) 的地位与作用, 特别是对唐代沙门法藏等人如来藏缘起论的阐释建构, 没有足够的重视。

本文引用格式

陈永革 . 非中国化与非宗派化: 日本批判佛教论及其效应[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2006 , 38(2) : 9 -15 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2006.02.002

Abstract

Chinese Buddhism is composed of both Geyi Buddhism (hermeneutic Buddhism) in the pre-sectarian period and Zhengyi Buddhism (existential Buddhism) in the period when sectarian Buddhism took shape.The Japanese Buddhism, as a kind of post-sectarian Buddhist thought, fails to do justice to the role played by the thought of Tathāgata-garbha and inner-Buddha (Original Enlightenment) in the formation of sectarian Buddhism in China, due to its inadequacy in historical understanding and textual interpretation.Particularly, it does not pay enough attention to Fa Zang and others' contribution to the interpretation and construction of Paticcasamuppada of Tathāgata-garbha in Tang Dynasty.

参考文献

1 [梁]慧皎. 汤用彤校. 义解一. 竺法雅[A]. 高僧传[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1992.
2 伊藤隆寿 1992, 中国佛教之批判的研究. 东京: 大藏出版社.
3 太虚. 太虚大师全书[C]. 香港: 香港佛学书局, 1956.
4 《大正藏》[Z].
Options
文章导航

/