“文学再现世界”命题源远流长, 有多种表述形式, 当下受到后现代语境的挑战。新世纪文论两种主要的因应策略是重释“再现”与重释“现实(世界)”。它们都及时吸纳进后现代思想的元素, 但也有模糊不清和意义矛盾的地方, 根源在于现代与后现代之间的深刻断裂及其调和的困难。本文主张运用“三个世界”的理论对“世界”内涵的细分化, 并提出“文学表现世界”的命题, 进而阐述其合理性和内涵。

The statement that"literature reproduces the world"has had a long history and diverse stating forms, but now it is confronted with some challenges out of post-modem contexts.The two primary responsive tactics in the new-century literary theory consist in a reinterpretation of"reproduction"and a reinterpretation of"reality(the world)".They both timely draw on certain elements of post-modem thoughts, but are somewhere ambiguous or contradictory in their meanings.The root lies in a deep break between modem and post-modem and a difficulty in reconcilability.This paper postulates to use the theory of"three worlds"to detail the implication of"the world, "and further expounds the rationality and implication of the statement that"literature reproduces the world."