On Normativity of Modern Logic and Its Problems
晋荣东 . 论现代逻辑的规范性及其问题[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2004 , 36(6) : 86 -93 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2004.06.010
Modern logic takes the criterion of validity as the source of its normative effectiveness. In fact, this criterion is not an effective method for evaluations of arguments in natural language. Moreover, in the respect of how to deal with issues related to the world of life, the neutrality of subject-matter, the ideal of formalization, the close-world assumption and logical monism, presupposed by the criterion of validity, all have some theoretical deficiencies. Therefore, it is difficult for modern logic to have a fruitful effect on the construction of and criticism at modernity.
1 | 王 路 逻辑的观念 北京 商务印书馆 2000 王路逻辑的观念[M]北京: 商务印书馆, 2000. |
2 | 吴 家国 逻辑散论 南宁 广西师范大学出版社 1996 吴家国逻辑散论[M]南宁: 广西师范大学出版社, 1996. |
3 | (美)苏珊·哈克逻辑哲学[M]北京: 商务印书馆, 2003. |
4 | TrudyGovier: ProblemsinArgumentAnalysisandEvaluation, Dordrecht: ForisPublicatlons, 1987. |
5 | GilbertRyle: FormalandInformalLogic, inContemporaryReadingsinLogicalTheory, edByI M Copi & amp; J A Gould, NewYork: Macmillan, 1967. |
6 | StephenToulmin: TheUsesofArgument, Cambridge: CambridgeUniversityPress, 1958. |
7 | HilaryPutnam: WhyReasonCan tBeNaturalized?inAfterphilosophy: EndorTransformation?ed byKennethBaynes, JamesBohman, andThomasMcCarthy, Cambridge: TheMITPress, 1991. |
8 | JugenHabermas: PostmetaphysicalThinking, Cambridge: PolityPress, 1995. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |