现代性视野中的知识与学术

论现代逻辑的规范性及其问题

  • 晋荣东
展开
晋荣东(1971——),男,四川成都人,华东师范大学哲学系副教授,博士

收稿日期: 2004-09-01

  网络出版日期: 2004-06-25

On Normativity of Modern Logic and Its Problems

Expand

Received date: 2004-09-01

  Online published: 2004-06-25

摘要

现代逻辑的规范性以有效性标准为效力之源, 但该标准不仅在评估自然语言论证方面缺乏效力, 而且在处理与生活世界相关的诸论题方面, 其所预设的题材中立性、形式化理想、封闭世界假定以及逻辑一元论也存在不少理论上的困难。因此, 现代逻辑对于现代性的建构和批判将难以有所作为

本文引用格式

晋荣东 . 论现代逻辑的规范性及其问题[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2004 , 36(6) : 86 -93 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2004.06.010

Abstract

Modern logic takes the criterion of validity as the source of its normative effectiveness. In fact, this criterion is not an effective method for evaluations of arguments in natural language. Moreover, in the respect of how to deal with issues related to the world of life, the neutrality of subject-matter, the ideal of formalization, the close-world assumption and logical monism, presupposed by the criterion of validity, all have some theoretical deficiencies. Therefore, it is difficult for modern logic to have a fruitful effect on the construction of and criticism at modernity.

参考文献

1 王 路 逻辑的观念 北京 商务印书馆 2000 王路逻辑的观念[M]北京: 商务印书馆, 2000.
2 吴 家国 逻辑散论 南宁 广西师范大学出版社 1996 吴家国逻辑散论[M]南宁: 广西师范大学出版社, 1996.
3 (美)苏珊·哈克逻辑哲学[M]北京: 商务印书馆, 2003.
4 TrudyGovier: ProblemsinArgumentAnalysisandEvaluation, Dordrecht: ForisPublicatlons, 1987.
5 GilbertRyle: FormalandInformalLogic, inContemporaryReadingsinLogicalTheory, edByI M Copi & amp; J A Gould, NewYork: Macmillan, 1967.
6 StephenToulmin: TheUsesofArgument, Cambridge: CambridgeUniversityPress, 1958.
7 HilaryPutnam: WhyReasonCan tBeNaturalized?inAfterphilosophy: EndorTransformation?ed byKennethBaynes, JamesBohman, andThomasMcCarthy, Cambridge: TheMITPress, 1991.
8 JugenHabermas: PostmetaphysicalThinking, Cambridge: PolityPress, 1995.
Options
文章导航

/