华东师范大学(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (3): 15-35.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2018.03.003

• 学术对话 • 上一篇    下一篇

社会科学哲学与方法论问题(笔谈)

陈嘉明1, 应奇2, 张留华3, 徐竹4, 贺敏年5   

  1. 1. 上海交通大学哲学系、厦门大学知识论与认知科学研究中心;
    2. 华东师范大学哲学系;
    3. 华东师范大学哲学系;
    4. 华东师范大学哲学系;
    5. 浙江大学哲学系
  • 出版日期:2018-05-15 发布日期:2018-05-22
  • 作者简介:陈嘉明,上海交通大学哲学系、厦门大学知识论与认知科学研究中心特聘教授;应奇,华东师范大学哲学系紫江特聘教授;张留华,华东师范大学哲学系教授;徐竹,华东师范大学哲学系副教授;贺敏年,浙江大学哲学系博士研究生。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金重大项目"当代知识论的系列研究"(项目编号:14ZDB012);教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目"当代国外社会科学方法论的新形态及中国化研究"(项目编号:17JZD041);国家社科基金重大项目"当代逻辑哲学重大前沿问题研究"(17ZDA024);教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目"当代国外社会科学方法论的新形态及中国化研究"(项目编号:17JZD041)。

Philosophy of Social Sciences and Its Methodology

CHEN Jia-ming1, YING Qi2, ZHANG Liu-hua3, XU Zhu4, HE Min-nian5   

  • Online:2018-05-15 Published:2018-05-22

摘要: 社会科学哲学与方法论问题不但是当前理论哲学与实践哲学的聚集点,而且本身成为了跨学科实践的理智平台和作业场所。这可以追溯到新康德主义的说明和理解的区分与融通贯穿社会科学方法论问题的始终,这种架构又与当前社会科学哲学讨论中的因果性研究范式和规范性研究范式形成对应和映照。如果说实践推理是贯穿从亚里士多德的实践哲学到维特根斯坦及其后学的行动哲学的枢纽和中轴,那么规范性理由以及一种独立、自足的规范性概念则呈现为社会科学哲学新近论辩中着力淬炼和收敛的方向。一方面要正视表现为客观性、规范性和复杂性的当前社会科学方法论的多维化智识生态,另一方面要坚持基于"合理性"概念以及个案导向的行动分析的实践学进路,中文语境下的社会科学哲学和方法论问题,在此找到了其再出发的重要契机。

关键词: 社会科学, 哲学, 方法论

Abstract: The issue concerning philosophy of social sciences and its methodology is only the focus of current theoretical philosophy and practical philosophy. It also has become an intellectual platform and a workplace for cross-discipline practice. It can be traced back to the distinction, as well as the connection, between the explanation and understanding, in Neo-Kantianism, which goes through the issue of methodology of social sciences from beginning to end. This structure also forms a contrast with causal research pattern and normative research pattern in current philosophical discussions of social sciences. If practical reasoning is the hub and axis that runs through the history from Aristotle's practical philosophy to philosophy of action in Wittgenstein and his disciples, normative reasons, as well as an independent and self-sufficient concept of norm, seems to direct recent debates on philosophy of social sciences. In order to create an important opportunity to restart, philosophy of social sciences and its methodology in the Chinese context should face the multi-dimensional intellectual ecology of current methodology of social sciences that shows objectivity, normativity and complexity on the one hand and stick to the practical approach of action analysis based on the concept of "rationality" and case orientation on the other.

Key words: social sciences, philosophy, methodology