华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (1): 26-34.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2026.01.003

• 哲学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

论18世纪英国道德情感主义哲学中的“投射”

李家莲   

  • 接受日期:2025-12-29 出版日期:2026-01-15 发布日期:2026-02-02
  • 作者简介:李家莲,湖北大学哲学学院教授(武汉,430062)
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金重大项目“经济与人文相互促进的理论基础、作用机制与协同路径研究”(项目编号:25&ZD113)。

On Projection in the 18th-centuryBritish Moral Sentimentalism

Jialian Li   

  • Accepted:2025-12-29 Online:2026-01-15 Published:2026-02-02

摘要:

18世纪英国道德情感主义哲学在投射的视镜中理解道德感官和同情机制。基于不同道德情感主义者的不同偏好,该派哲学围绕审美、仁爱、效用和同情这四种不同的偏好创立了四种不同投射范式,据此理解道德赞同/不赞同,并在不预设任何既定道德判断原则的前提下,确立了情感主义道德判断原则和规范原则。然而,在投射视镜的钳制下,由于18世纪英国道德情感主义哲学未能把行动确立为道德赞同/不赞同与道德判断原则之间的有效连接点,也未能据此确立道德善的评价性特征,因此该派道德哲学构建的道德判断与规范原则从根本上来说是失败的。

关键词: 道德情感主义, 投射, 道德判断, 道德规范

Abstract:

The 18th-century British moral sentimentalism understands moral sense and the mechanism of sympathy from the perspective of projection. Based on different preferences of moral sentimentalists, this school, without taking any established moral judgment principle as a preconceived premise, creates four types of projection, i.e., aesthetic projection, benevolence projection, utility projection and sympathy projection, and use them to understand moral approval/disapproval, which is regarded as the presupposition of moral judgment and normativity. However, under the restriction of projection, the 18th-century British moral sentimentalism fails to establish action as an effective connection between moral approval/disapproval and moral judgment principles and thereby determine the evaluative characteristics of moral goodness. Therefore, the moral judgment and normative principles constructed by this school of moral philosophy are fundamentally flawed.

Key words: moral sentimentalism, projection, moral judgement, moral normativity