华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (3): 42-53.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2026.03.005

• 历史研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

钱端升政治学研究中的“中国”论述

王向民, 杨洋   

  • 接受日期:2026-04-24 出版日期:2026-05-15 发布日期:2026-05-30
  • 作者简介:王向民,华东师范大学政治与国际关系学院教授(上海,200241)
    杨洋,南京师范大学马克思主义学院副教授(南京,210023)
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金重大项目“百年来中国政治学史研究”(项目编号:19ZDA133)。

The “China” Discourse in Qian Duansheng’s Political Science Research

Xiang-min Wang, Yang Yang   

  • Accepted:2026-04-24 Online:2026-05-15 Published:2026-05-30

摘要:

中国自主知识体系意味着“中国”成为分析性概念,并在古今中西的意识结构、建制性概念、方法论提炼与理论化等方面形成丰富的论述。民国政治学家的“中国论述”多大程度上反映“中国”概念的分析能力,是检讨民国政治学知识内容的重要方面。钱端升在党治国家、政府与政治、行政效率、国家政制四个研究领域均有建树,具有明确的古今中西的意识结构,开创了“党治”国家和“强大国家+尊重民权”政体两个建制性概念。然而,受制于国家实践经验与域外理论发展,其研究的概念化与理论化方面仍有一定局限,未能充分将“中国”转化为分析性概念,影响了研究的理论深度与专业化程度。

关键词: 钱端升, 中国论述, 建制性概念, 自主知识, 中国政治学史

Abstract:

“China’s self-developed knowledge system” means that “China” functions as an analytical concept, forming a rich discourse across dimensions such as the consciousness structure of “the past, the present, the Chinese and the Western”, institutional concepts, methodological refinement, and theorization. To what extent the “China” discourse of political scientists in Republican China demonstrates the analytical capacity of the concept of “China” constitutes an important aspect of evaluating the knowledge content of political science in Republican China. Qian Duansheng made significant contributions in four research areas: the party-state, government and politics, administrative efficiency, and state political institutions. He possessed a clear consciousness structure of “the past, the present, the Chinese and the Western”, and pioneered two institutional concepts: the party-state and the political system combining a strong state with respect for civil rights. However, constrained by the limitations of national practical experience and the development of foreign theories, his research still exhibited certain shortcomings in conceptualization and theorization. It failed to fully transform “China” into an analytical concept, which affected the theoretical depth and professional rigor of his scholarship.

Key words: Qian Duansheng, “China” discourse, institutional concepts, self-developed knowledge, history of Chinese political science