华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (3): 91-100.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2026.03.009

• 文学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

形散神凝:《四库总目》 诗文评类例“体兼说部”的历史生成与话语价值

朱银宁   

  • 出版日期:2026-05-15 发布日期:2026-05-30
  • 作者简介:朱银宁,上海交通大学人文学院助理研究员(上海,200081)
  • 基金资助:
    国家资助博士后研究人员计划(项目编号:GZC20252559);上海交通大学文科青年人才培育项目(项目编号:2026QN020)。

Form Scattered but Spirit Focused:The Historical Formation and Discursive Value of “Genre Overlapping with the Shuobu” under “Literary Criticism” in General Catalogue of the Four Treasuries

Yinning Zhu   

  • Online:2026-05-15 Published:2026-05-30

摘要:

“体兼说部”是古典目录学集大成者《四库总目》 确立的“诗文评”五种子类之一,以《六一诗话》 《中山诗话》 为代表,其历史生成有三个关键时刻。其肇端于宋,欧阳修有意在“资闲谈”外衣下借小说之体、运良史之才、作文章家言,创体了被追溯为类例代表的《六一诗话》 ;发扬于明,王世贞基于吴中文化与门户立场,联合群体在文权角逐中彰显文化资本与治学个性,将《艺苑卮言》 纳入了自己文集中创设的“说部”;确立于清,《总目》 底本中的部分“说家”作品被《总目》 改隶“诗文评”,乾隆帝与纪昀又肯定说部学术价值,“体兼说部”类例得以成立。三朝历经个人创体、群体运作、官方建制,可见“体兼说部”是出于理性设计与历史选择的诗学范式,具有合法性、有效性、日常性,值得与西方诗学系统性理论专著的主流范式交流互鉴。

关键词: 《总目》, 诗文评, 体兼说部, 生成史, 自主话语

Abstract:

“Genre Overlapping with the Shuobu (fictional and anecdotal writings)” constitutes one of the five subcategories of “literary criticism” in General Catalogue of the Four Treasuries. Represented by the works such as Six One Poetic Discourses and Central Mountain Poetic Discourses, its historical formation involved three key stages. It was initiated in Ouyang Xiu’s Six One Poetic Discourses in the Song Dynasty. Deliberately under the guise of “leisure chat”, Ouyang Xiu created this representative work integrating the form of fiction, the talent of a good historian and the words of a literary writer. It was developed in the Ming Dynasty. Wang Shizhen, with the cultural and factional stance in Wuzhong, united a group to demonstrate their cultural capital and academic individuality in the competition for literary authority, and included Miscellaneous Notes on the Arts in the Shuobu in his own collection of works. Finally, it was established in the Qing Dynasty. Some of the fictional works in the original version of General Catalogue were reclassified in “literary criticism” in the last version of General Catalogue. Emperor Qianlong and his minister Ji Yun affirmed the academic value of the Shuobu, and “genre overlapping with the Shuobu” was thus established. These three stages, which are respectively characterized by individual creation, group operation, and official establishment, demonstrate that the “genre overlapping with the Shuobu” is a poetic paradigm that was rationally designed and historically selected. Possessing legitimacy, effectiveness and daily relevance, this genre is worthy of exchange and mutual learning with the mainstream paradigms of systematic theories in Western poetics.

Key words: General Catalogue of the Four Treasuries, literary criticism, genre overlapping with the Shuobu, history of formation, self-developed discourse