华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (5): 128-137.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2025.05.011

• 社会学研究 • 上一篇    

玛丽·道格拉斯的文化理论及其欧洲人论思想传统

黄剑波   

  • 接受日期:2025-09-05 出版日期:2025-09-15 发布日期:2025-10-09
  • 作者简介:黄剑波,华东师范大学人类学研究所教授,中国现代城市研究中心研究员,上海市“中国特色的转型社会学”社会科学创新研究基地研究员(上海,200241)
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金重点项目“汉语人类学百年学术史及理论回顾”(项目编号:3AMZ005)。

Mary Douglas’ Cultural Theories and the European Anthropological Thought Traditions

Jianbo Huang   

  • Accepted:2025-09-05 Online:2025-09-15 Published:2025-10-09

摘要:

著名人类学家玛丽·道格拉斯的《洁净与危险》 凭借对污染与社会秩序的深入剖析久负盛名,然而也在一定程度上遮蔽了她晚年对宗教经典以及西方现代社会的探赜。若将其与三十年后出版的《作为文学的〈利未记〉》 彼此参照,可更鲜活地勾勒出道格拉斯的思想仪轨与文化理论的生成脉络。天主教思想传统与人类学范式的濡染与激荡,影响了她的“有序”“包容”乃至“自由”的秩序观。道格拉斯的个案提示我们,人类学乃至现代社会理论,实未必如其标榜那样超迈特定的历史与思想襟怀。学理之赓续与嬗变,始终受制于特定的思想传统,因此有必要以更为自觉的方式理解现代社会理论的知识论基础与可能性。

关键词: 《洁净与危险》, 《作为文学的〈利未记〉》, 有序的宇宙, 人类学思想史

Abstract:

Renowned anthropologist Mary Douglas’s Purity and Danger is well-known for its in-depth analysis of pollution and social order. However, it also, to some extent, obscures her later reflections on religious scriptures and modern Western society. Comparing it with Leviticus as Literature, published thirty years later, we can more vividly outline Douglas’s intellectual trajectory and the generative process of her cultural theories. The influence and turbulence of Catholic thought traditions and anthropological paradigms shaped her views on “order”, “tolerance”, and even “freedom”. Douglas’ case suggests that anthropology and modern social theory may not be as detached from specific historical and intellectual sympathies as they claim. The continuity and evolution of scholarly ideas are always influenced by particular ideological traditions. Therefore, it is necessary for us to consciously understand the epistemological foundations and possibilities of modern social theory.

Key words: Purity and Danger, Leviticus as Literature, ordered universe, history of anthropological thought