华东师范大学(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2014, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 59-68.

• 近代史研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

再论“东南互保”时期的郑观应

戴海斌   

  1. 上海社会科学院历史研究所,上海,200235
  • 出版日期:2014-05-15 发布日期:2014-09-29
  • 通讯作者: 戴海斌
  • 作者简介:戴海斌
  • 基金资助:

    上海市哲学社会科学规划青年课题的(2012ELS001)阶段性成果

A New Study of Zheng Guanying in the “Mutual Protection of Southeast China” Period

DAI Hai-bin   

  • Online:2014-05-15 Published:2014-09-29
  • Contact: DAI Hai-bin
  • About author:DAI Hai-bin

摘要: 郑观应以商人的冷静和理性,着眼于“不宜慕虚名而贾实祸”的现实考虑,慎密操作了招商局轮船的“换旗”交涉,并出于政治考量、对“东南互保”局面的巩固和进一步发展多有建言。他参与中国国会,出于对“勤王”旗帜的认同,在反义和拳、反排外、反北方政府等问题上有着充分自觉,对变政维新的前景也抱有强烈愿望,并通过上书陈情,付诸于行动。这些事实所蕴含的历史纵深信息,不仅为我们更加深刻地理解其言说与时代的关系提供了线索,也为反思既有史学叙事中新旧对垒、此长彼消的单调认知提供了极佳的素材。

关键词: 郑观应, 盛宣怀, 东南互保, 中国国会

Abstract: With the consideration that “one should be suffered from a real disaster resulted from the pursuit of a vain fame”, Zheng Guanying secretly and carefully conducted the “Flag Changing” activity on the ship of China Merchants Steamship Company with a businessman’s calmness and reason. With political consideration, he also provided lots of advices concerning strengthening and developing the “Mutual Protection of Southeast China” from the political perspective. He participated in Chinese Parliament. With the acceptance of “being dutiful to the throne”, he consciously opposed Boxer Movement, exclusivity and the Northern Government. On the other hand, he had strong desire about the prospect of the political reform and carried it into practice by submitting petitions. The profound historical information implied in these facts not only provides us with clues to understand more deeply the relation between his words and his time, but also provides us with excellent material to rethink the monotone paradigm in the extant historical narrations which holds the sharp confrontation between the new and the old.