华东师范大学(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (1): 79-88.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2018.01.006

• 文学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

《史记·越王句践世家》疏证——兼论《史记》“实录”与“尚奇”之矛盾

汪春泓   

  1. 香港岭南大学中文系
  • 出版日期:2018-01-15 发布日期:2018-01-26
  • 作者简介:汪春泓,香港岭南大学中文系教授。

An Analysis of Noble Ruler Goujian of the State Yue in Historical Records: Also on the Contradiction between “Recording Facts” and “Advocating Wonders” of Historical Records

WANG Chun-hong   

  • Online:2018-01-15 Published:2018-01-26

摘要: 文章讨论了《史记》中"实录"和"爱奇"的矛盾,亦探讨此书史学性质和文学性质的边界之所在。以《越王句践世家》为例,分析其材料之采择,多属于小说家言之成分,表达了观念主导下的历史演绎,并且其所谓历史叙述存在着故事原型,从而佐证一部《史记》很难以"实录"视之。

关键词: 实录, 爱奇, 史家, 小说家, 移花接木, 故事原型

Abstract: This paper discusses the contradiction between "recording facts" and "advocating wonders" in Historical Records, as well as the boundary between history and literature in it. An analysis of Noble Ruler Goujian of the State Yue shows that most of its materials are from novels, its historical development is philosophically dominated, and there is a story prototype behind the so-called historical narrative. This tells us that Historical Records is not completely a pure record of facts.

Key words: recording facts, advocating wonders, historian, novelist, stealthily substitute one thing for another, story prototype