华东师范大学(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (3): 149-157.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2018.03.014

• 社会法律问题研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

被遗忘权:制度构造与中国本土化研究

于浩   

  1. 华东师范大学法学院, 上海, 200241
  • 出版日期:2018-05-15 发布日期:2018-05-22
  • 作者简介:于浩,华东师范大学法学院研究员(上海,200241)。
  • 基金资助:
    司法部2016年度国家法治与法学理论研究项目"我国法治建设基本概念研究"(项目编号:16SFB3003)。

Right to Be Forgotten: A Study of System Constitution and Chinese Localization

YU Hao   

  • Online:2018-05-15 Published:2018-05-22

摘要: 被遗忘权是法律为应对现代资讯科技产生威胁的一种权利设置,是对传统信息删除权的扩张,大数据时代被遗忘权问题更加凸显。就制度构造而言,被遗忘权以个人信息主体为权利主体、以信息控制者为义务主体、以特定的个人网络信息为权利客体。在域外适用上,基于隐私权和言论自由的认识及重视差异,欧盟和美国对被遗忘权的理论基础和保护路径态度迥异。立足于中国现实及已有司法裁判,应当从"人格利益"出发,将被遗忘权认定为个人信息权而非隐私权,以现有的《侵权责任法》等法律规范为基础,依托未来制定的民法,进一步制定《个人信息保护法》,充分实现被遗忘权的中国本土化保护。

关键词: 被遗忘权, 隐私权, 个人信息权, 言论自由

Abstract: The right to be forgotten is a right to cope with the threat caused by modern IT, and also an expansion of traditional right of information deletion. In the era of big data, the problem of the right to be forgotten has become more pressing. As for system constitution, personal information subject is the subject of the right to be forgotten, the subject of duty is the information controller, and the object of right is the specific personal network information. Due to different understanding of the right of privacy and the freedom of expression, the European Union and the United States have different views on the theoretical basis and the protection path of the right to be forgotten. Based on the reality of China, the existing judicial decisions and the perspective of "personality interest", the right to be forgotten should be identified as the right of personal information rather than the right of privacy. Therefore, we should make The Protection of Personal Information Law based on the existing Tort Liability Law and other related laws as well as the foreseeable Civil Law, so that we can completely localize the way to protect the right to be forgotten.

Key words: right to be forgotten, right of privacy, right of personal information, freedom of expression