华东师范大学(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (3): 158-166.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2018.03.015

• 社会法律问题研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国《刑法》中从业禁止适用程序研究

陈庆安   

  1. 上海社会科学院法学研究所, 上海, 200020
  • 出版日期:2018-05-15 发布日期:2018-05-22
  • 作者简介:陈庆安,上海社会科学院法学研究所副研究员(上海,200020)。

On Procedures for Application of Employment Prohibition in China's Criminal Law

CHEN Qing-an   

  • Online:2018-05-15 Published:2018-05-22

摘要: 目前,我国《刑法》中关于从业禁止的适用程序尚无明确的法律依据,影响了从业禁止的适用效果。从业禁止虽然与"禁止令"存在部分相似之处,但二者的差异远大于共性,因此应当有独立的适用程序。为保证从业禁止公正准确地适用,应当有多元化的启动参与主体,因此建议引入社会调查制度。从业禁止的宣告时间和执行主体,应当根据适用对象是自然人还是单位而灵活掌握,并结合适用内容区别对待,同时应当建立相应的复权制度。为了平衡自由和秩序,还应当赋予适用对象相应的上诉和申诉权利。

关键词: 从业禁止, 适用程序, 启动主体, 宣告时间, 执行主体, 救济程序

Abstract: There is no clear legal foundation for procedures for application of employment prohibition in China's Criminal Law, which has influenced the effect of application of employment prohibition. Although there is something in common between employment prohibition and restraining order, they have more differences rather than similarities, so that there should be independent procedures for application of employment prohibition. In order to secure fair and adequate application of employment prohibition, subjects initiating and participating such application should be diversified and social investigation system should be introduced. The time of announcing employment prohibition and the execution subject should be flexible according to the fact that the prohibited person is a natural person or a unit, combining the content of the prohibited issue. In addition, the corresponding system of regaining the right to employment should be established. For the purpose of balancing freedom and order, the prohibited person should be endowed with rights to appeal and complaint.

Key words: employment prohibition, procedures for application, initiating subject, time of announcement, execution subject, relief procedures