华东师范大学(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (6): 120-128.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2019.06.013

• 国家话语生态研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

菲律宾媒体南海话语合法性的构建:基于甘姆森“诠释包裹”的框架分析

叶淑兰1, 易妍1, 王乃一2   

  1. 1. 华东师范大学政治学系 上海, 200241;
    2. 上海财经大学金融学院 上海, 200433
  • 出版日期:2019-11-15 发布日期:2019-11-25
  • 作者简介:叶淑兰,华东师范大学政治学系副教授(上海,200241);易妍,华东师范大学政治学系副教授(上海,200241);王乃一,上海财经大学金融学院助教(上海,200433)。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金项目"菲律宾南海话语构建与中国对策研究"(项目编号:15BGJ004)。

How Philippine Media Construct Philippines' Discourse Legitimacy on the South China Sea Issue: Based on Gamson's Approach of “Interpretive Packages”

YE Shu-lan1, YI Yan1, WANG Nai-yi2   

  • Online:2019-11-15 Published:2019-11-25

摘要: 南海问题一直是影响中美、中国与东盟国家关系的重要议题。文章运用国际政治与传播学交叉研究视角,在甘姆森"诠释包裹"框架理论基础上,分析了菲律宾媒体如何建构南海话语的合法性。研究发现,菲律宾媒体的话语建构存在受害者、守法者以及合作者三大框架,同时使用了包含隐喻对潜意识的调用、二元对立的描述、短语警句的情绪动员、逻辑性数据的运用以及视觉影像的冲击这五方面的策略。菲律宾南海话语合法性的构建给中国造成了相当大的国际舆论压力,这需要进一步思考中国如何加强南海法理理据的对外传播,主动设置与引领南海议题等问题,从而加强与海外媒体的话语沟通和合作,提升南海话语传播的技巧与艺术,讲好中国的南海故事。

关键词: 菲律宾, 南海, 话语合法性, 框架分析

Abstract: The South China Sea issue has remained one of important issues affecting Sino-US relations and China-ASEAN ties. From an interdisciplinary perspective of international politics and communication and media studies and based on Gamson's constructionist approach of "interpretive packages", this paper explores how Philippine media construct Philippines' discourse legitimacy. It finds that the Philippine media have made use of three main discourse frames:"victim", "law-abider" and "collaborator". At the same time, they have also developed five discourse strategies:the adoption of metaphors, the description of binary opposition, the application of logical data as well as the usage of visual images. Those discourses on the South China Sea issue from Philippine media have exerted great pressure on the Chinese side. This paper suggests that China should develop the legal and rational discourse in its international communication on the one hand, and enhance its ability in agenda-setting, communication skills as well as telling a good Chinese story of the South China Sea on the other.

Key words: Philippines, South China Sea, discourse legitimacy, frame analysis