华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (6): 107-115.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2021.06.010

• 社会文化研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

流行病的回归与全球−地方健康问题的政治学研究

[美]卡维塔   

  • 出版日期:2021-11-15 发布日期:2021-11-25
  • 作者简介:卡维塔(Kavita Sivaramakrishnan),美国哥伦比亚大学梅尔曼公共卫生学院社会医学科学教授。本文由华南理工大学新闻与传播学院储冬爱教授等翻译
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金重大项目“公共卫生安全视域下的‘灾害文化’与强韧社会建构研究”(项目编号:20&ZD152)

The Return of Epidemic and Political Research on Global-regional Health Issue

SIVARAMAKRISHNAN Kavita   

  • Online:2021-11-15 Published:2021-11-25

摘要:

流行病的爆发不是一个孤立的事件,常常会引发地方和全球连锁反应。重温1994年印度苏拉特的鼠疫案例,可以了解全球、印度政府和地方邦政府在公共卫生和政治权威各个交叉层面上的相互影响,以及各自表达的特定的政治关切、社会焦虑和当务之急。疫情期间全球和地方层面出现了相互重叠的多层叙事,说明公共卫生及其政治学存在多个同心圆,我们必须分析它们之间的交集,厘清不同的观念和反应,以应对、解决与疫情命名、公共卫生和政治影响相关的复杂挑战。苏拉特疫情为WHO提供了一个重要契机,使其能够采取更具干预性的战略,为建立全球性的疾病监测网络、加强各国在公共卫生治理方面的合作提供了一个重要的参考点,而持续紧张的区域局势和不同国家的关注点影响了各方在疫情认知问题上的政治博弈。苏拉特瘟疫和围绕它的争议说明有必要把全球卫生列为一个既具综合性、又有专业性,需从整体上来把握的优先事项,而不是简单理解为国际、国家和地方等不同层级之间的利益博弈。研究有助于我们理解和建构在当今不断变化的全球政治生态下的公共健康议题。

关键词: 苏拉特鼠疫, 世界卫生组织, 公共卫生, 优先事项, 国际政治

Abstract:

Epidemic outbreaks, from a comprehensive and inter-connected perspective, are simultaneously local and global events. Reviewing the outbreak of the plague in Surat, India in 1994, we can understand the interaction of the governments of each country, the Indian government and the local state governments in India in terms of public health and political authority, as well as their specific political concerns, social anxieties and priorities. During the epidemic, there were overlapping multi-layer narratives at the global and local levels, indicating that there are multiple concentric circles in public health and its politics. To meet and solve the complex challenges related to epidemic naming, public health and political impact, we must analyze the intersection between them and clarify different concepts and reactions. The Surat epidemic provides an important opportunity for WHO to adopt a more interventionist strategy, and provides an important reference point for establishing a global disease monitoring network and strengthening cooperation among countries in public health governance. The continuous tense regional situation and concerns of different countries affect the political game on epidemic cognition. The plague in Surat and the disputes surrounding it show that it is necessary to list global health as a priority that is both comprehensive and professional. It needs to be grasped as a whole, rather than simply understood as a game of interests among different levels such as international, national and local. This research will help us understand and construct public health issues under today’s changing global political ecology.

Key words: plague in Surat, World Health Organization (WHO), public health, priorities, international politics