华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (5): 112-122.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2026.05.011

• 社会学研究 • 上一篇    

非人他者的道德嵌入:人机互动中的责任重构及其反思

文军   

  • 出版日期:2026-09-15 发布日期:2026-10-09
  • 作者简介:文军,华东师范大学中国现代城市研究中心暨社会发展学院教授,上海市“中国特色的转型社会学研究”社会科学创新研究基地首席专家(上海,200441)
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金重大项目“新形势下我国社会发展面临的不确定性及其应对机制研究”(项目编号:22&ZD183)。

The Moral Embedding of Nonhuman Others:Reconstructing Responsibility in Human-Machine Interaction and Reflecting on Its Implications

Jun Wen   

  • Online:2026-09-15 Published:2026-10-09

摘要:

当人工智能从被动的工具客体演变为能够介入人类决策、情感与判断的“非人他者”,传统社会的归责机制正遭遇结构性失灵。既有讨论多在伦理学层面争论机器“应否”享有道德地位,而社会学则可以转向考察非人他者的道德身份在日常互动中如何被生产,又如何重新分配社会的责任。研究表明,非人他者的“道德嵌入”表现在情感展演、情境定义与角色互构中,瓦解了以自由意志和线性因果为前提的个体归责范式,使责任从单一主体弥散为人机网络的分布式属性。这一研究取向可以指出,责任的弥散绝非价值中立的技术后果,它沿既有的权力落差再分配,往往演化为强势者卸责、弱势者“背锅”的机制。由此,人机责任体系的重塑与其说是治理技术问题,不如说是社会权力关系的再生产。

关键词: 非人他者, 道德嵌入, 人机互动, 责任弥散, 行动者网络

Abstract:

As artificial intelligence evolves from a passive tool-object into a “nonhuman other” capable of participating in human decision-making, emotion, and judgment, traditional mechanisms for attributing responsibility are undergoing structural failure. Existing discussions largely debate, at the ethical level, whether machines “ought” to possess moral status. Sociology, however, can instead examine how the moral identity of nonhuman others is produced in everyday interaction and how it redistributes social responsibility. It shows that the “moral embedding” of nonhuman others occurs through emotional performance, situation definition, and the mutual constitution of roles. It undermines the individualistic paradigm of responsibility attribution, which presupposes free will and linear causality, and disperses responsibility from a single subject into a distributed property of human-machine networks. This approach reveals that the diffusion of responsibility is by no means a value-neutral technological consequence. Responsibility is redistributed along existing gradients of power and often becomes a mechanism through which the powerful shed responsibility while the less powerful are made to bear the blame. Reconstructing a system of human-machine responsibility is therefore less a technical problem of governance than a reproduction of social power relations.

Key words: nonhuman others, moral embedding, human-machine interaction, diffusion of responsibility, actor-network