华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2006, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2): 30-37.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2006.02.005

• “批判佛教”之批判 • 上一篇    下一篇

对20世纪中国佛教批判风潮的双重省察

唐忠毛   

  1. 华东师范大学 学报编辑部，上海 200062
  • 收稿日期:2005-12-02 出版日期:2006-03-30 发布日期:2006-03-30
  • 作者简介:唐忠毛(1969——)，男，安徽舒城人，华东师范大学学报编辑部编辑，讲师、哲学博士

Two-fold Reflection on the Stream of Thought Which Was Critical of Buddhism in the 20th Century

Zhong-mao TANG   

  1. Editoial Board, Joumal of East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
  • Received:2005-12-02 Online:2006-03-30 Published:2006-03-30

RichHTML

5

被引次数

1

摘要：

20世纪以来, 针对中国佛教如来藏、本觉思想的批判已经形成一股风潮, 其中, 内学院吕与日本“批判佛教”是批判最为彻底的两个代表。吕归宗瑜伽唯识学, 将受如来藏、本觉思想影响的中国佛教诸经论统统判为“伪经伪论”; 日本“批判佛教”则认为如来藏、本觉思想带有一种“基体论”、“实体论”倾向, 因而是反佛教精神的“非佛教”。回应批判, 不仅需要在义理层面论证如来藏、本觉思想的“合法性”, 也需要将义理之辨与立场、方法论以及现代性的反省结合起来。同时, 以“批判”为契机的中国佛学自身反省也应该成为回应批判的一个重要组成部分。

关键词: 如来藏, 本觉, 批判佛教, 自性戒, 圆融, 现代性

Abstract:

It has become a stream of thought to criticize the doctrine of Tathāgata-garbha and the doctrine of inner-Buddha (Original Enlightenment) since the 20th century.The two most radical representatives are Lücheng in ZhiNaNeiXueYuan in China and the Japanese critical Buddhism.Lücheng was converted to the doctrine of Yoga Consciousness-only.He imputed the Chinese Buddhist classics influenced by the doctrine of Tathāgata-garbha and doctrine of inner-Buddha to be fake classics.Critical Buddhism argues that the doctrine of Tathāgata-garbha and the doctrine of inner-Buddha are a kind of substantialism which is anti-Buddhist in spirit.The author claims that in response to the criticism, one should not only argue for the legitimacy of the coctrine of Tathāgata-garbha and the doctrine of inner-Buddha, but also look at the issue in the perspective of the historical process of modernizaton.At the meantime, the self-reflection of Chinese Buddhism should also be a part of the response to the criticism.

Key words: Tathāgata-garbha, inner-Buddha (Original Enlightenment), critical Buddhism, self-nature precept, perfect and harmonizing, modernity

中图分类号: