由中央有关单位设计推行，城市政府参评的城市类评比达标表彰项目（国家城市光荣榜）在推动城市非经济领域建设中发挥了重要作用。以多城联创为视角，以全国文明城市、国家园林城市、国家卫生城市和国家环境保护模范城市四类典型项目为对象，分析城市上榜次数的时空演化特征及其影响因素，发现上榜城市数量逐年增加，且多城联创的情况逐渐占据主导，上榜次数呈现东多西少的空间分布特征，并逐渐向中部、西部延伸，城市上榜次数具有显著的空间集聚特征且具有强化态势，热点格局呈东热西冷状态；各类国家城市光荣榜评价体系的评价流程与内容具有许多共性特征，造成了多城联创的刺激信号、激励机制、参评动机具有一定的相似性，进而使得城市在多城联创时具有边际成本递减效应；影响城市上榜的资源和能力因素包括城市政府政治动员能力、财政和经济实力、城市基础设施建设与公共服务供给能力；有明显区域异质性的上榜影响因素主要集中在城市环境治理与公共服务供给方面；不同项目间存在着非对称的上榜促进作用。今后，相关方面应从改进测评方法、加强复查工作、优化评价指标和基于新发展理念进行项目创新等方面优化国家城市光荣榜激励机制，进而提高城市治理水平。

The city-based awarding and commendation projects designed and implemented by the central government （National City Glory Lists） have played an important role in promoting urban non-economic development. This paper analyses the spatio-temporal dynamics of the number of times on-the-list cities and the influencing factors from the perspective of Multi-honor Joint Creation by using four typical projects as National Civilized City, National Garden City, National Sanitary City and National Model City for Environmental Protection. It finds out that the number of the cities on the list has been increasing year by year, and Multi-honor Joint Creation cases gradually becomes dominative. The number of cities on the list reveals the spatial pattern of more in the east and less in the west, and gradually extends to the central and western parts of the country. The frequency of cities on the list has been significantly characterized by spatial agglomeration, this trend is increasing year by year and the hotspot pattern is hot in the east and cold in the west. The process and evaluation system of the National City Glory Lists share many common features, resulting in the similarity of stimulating signals, mechanisms and motivation of participants. In this way, cities can obtain a diminishing marginal cost effect for Multi-honor Joint Creation. The factors that influence the ability to become a city on the list are political mobilization ability, financial and economic strength, and the ability to build urban infrastructure and provide public services. There is indeed an asymmetric promotion effect between different projects. Finally, in order to optimize the mechanism of the National City Glory Lists and improve the performance of urban governance, we shall improve evaluation methods, strengthen review work, optimize evaluation indicators, and innovate projects based on new development concepts.