华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) >

2005 , Vol. 37 >Issue 3: 18 - 122

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2005.03.003

逻辑学研究

逻辑学: 从“是”到“蕴涵”

  • 张留华
展开
张留华(1976—)，男，河南周口人，浦东新区行政学院讲师

收稿日期: 2004-06-04

  网络出版日期: 2005-03-25

收起

Logic: From "Be" to "Imply"

  • Liu-hua ZHANG
Expand

Received date: 2004-06-04

  Online published: 2005-03-25

Fold

摘要

“是”是逻辑学研究的一个核心概念, 探究“是”这一系词所表示的明晰的逻辑关系一直是逻辑学家们所努力的工作。本文通过对于“是”与“蕴涵”之间联系的历史探索, 试图澄清传统逻辑与现代逻辑的历史连续性和内在一致性。

关键词： 是; 系词; 关系; 蕴涵; 现代逻辑与传统逻辑

本文引用格式

张留华 . 逻辑学: 从“是”到“蕴涵”[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2005 , 37(3) : 18 -122 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2005.03.003

Abstract

The copula word "be" is a core concept in logical studies. Logicians have been working at its definite logical relations with great efforts. Through a historical exploration of the connection between "be" and "imply, " this paper seeks to clarify the historical continuity and internal coherence from traditional to modern logic.

Key words： be; copula; relation; implication; traditional logic

参考文献

1 王路 2000, 理性与智慧. 上海: 三联书店.
2 J.M. Baldwin(ed. ). Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology[Z]. The Macmillan Company, 1925.
3 John Neville Keynes . 1928, Studies and Exercises in Formal Logic. London: Macmillan.
4 C.I. Lewis . 1960, A Survey of Symbolic Logic. New York: Dover Publications, Ins..
5 约翰·巴斯摩尔. 洪汉鼎等译. 哲学百年·新近哲学家[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1996.
6 I. M. Bochenski. A History of Formal Logic[M]. Translated and edited by Ivo Thomas. Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1970.
7 Charles Sanders Peirce. Writings of Charles S. Peirce: a Chronological Edition[C]. Edited by the Peirce Edition Project. Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1982.
8 Charles Sanders Peirce. Collected Papers of C. S. Peirce[C]. Edited by Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1931—1958.
9 Geraldine Brady . 2000, From Peirce to Skolem: A Neglected Chapter in the History of Logic. North-Holland.
10 H. Putnam . , 1982, "Peirce the Logician", Historia Mathematica, Vol.9, paper 290- 301.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉