Journal of East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) >
Industrial Policy Effectiveness and Its Influence Factors: A Study Based on Enterprise Survey in Pudong New Area
The formulation of industrial policy is a process of public choice. Industrial policy effectiveness is influenced by the relationship between policy supply and policy demand and depends on the interaction of policy supply factors and policy audience factors. Based on the data analysis of Industrial Policy Survey in Pudong New Area, this paper studies the influential factors of industrial policy effectiveness. The results show that when the actual perception of industrial policy effectiveness is higher than the expectation of it, industrial policy partly fails, while short-term effectiveness is more pronounced than long-term effectiveness; and when the actual benefits of long-term effectiveness is lower than expected returns, this unbalanced relationship will incentivize industry players to promote policy innovation. In the process of formulating industrial policy, the government has a greater influence on subjective preferences, and the degree of fit between industrial policy and corporate needs is low, which weakens the effectiveness of industrial policy; the stability of industrial policy and the diversity of promotion channels help to improve industrial policy effectiveness. Enterprises that make greater contributions to the development of local economies are more likely to gain industrial policy tilts and support, and those with higher levels of development feedback higher industrial policy effectiveness. Therefore, in order to further optimize regional industrial policy and improve the effectiveness, decision makers should pay more attention to the laws of market, making subdivision policy, combining the long-term and phased nature of policy, optimizing information distribution and management, and improving the implementation and evaluation of policy.
CHENG Jin , LIN Lan , SHANG Yong-min . Industrial Policy Effectiveness and Its Influence Factors: A Study Based on Enterprise Survey in Pudong New Area[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2018 , 50(4) : 163 -171 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2018.04.018
范仓海、唐德善,2009,《基于公共选择理论的水资源政策市场研究》,《人民长江》第5期。
韩乾、洪永淼,2014,《国家产业政策、资产价格与投资者行为》,《经济研究》第12期。
韩小威,2006,《有效产业政策的具体准则构架》,《东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版)》第3期。
黄新华、李凯,2011,《公共选择理论与交易成本政治学的比较分析》,《财经问题研究》第1期。
江飞涛、李晓萍,2010,《直接干预市场与限制竞争:中国产业政策的取向与根本缺陷》,《中国工业经济》第9期。
江小涓,1993,《中国推行产业政策中的公共选择问题》,《经济研究》第6期。
寇宗来、刘学悦、刘瑾,2017,《产业政策导致了产能过剩吗?——基于中国工业行业的经验研究》,《复旦学报(社会科学版)》第5期。
李明,2016,《受众视角下的公共政策执行及其效果——基于中国村民村委会选举参与的分析》,《学术月刊》第7期。
林兰、屠启宇,2013,《上海产业结构演变及其政策思考(1978-2010)》,《上海经济研究》第8期。
林毅夫,2012,《新结构经济学——反思经济发展和政策的理论框架》,北京:北京大学出版社。
林毅夫,2017,《产业政策与我国经济的发展:新结构经济学的视角》,《复旦学报(社会科学版)》第2期。
刘社建,2014,《中国产业政策的演进、问题及对策》,《学术月刊》第2期。
宋凌云、王贤彬,2013,《重点产业政策、资源重置与产业生产率》,《管理世界》第12期。
孙早、席建成,2015,《中国式产业政策的实施效果:产业升级还是短期经济增长》,《中国工业经济》第7期。
王臻荣、常轶军,2008,《政府失灵的又一种救治途径——一种不同于公共选择理论的分析》,《中国行政管理》第1期。
王志勇、陈雪梅,2014,《产业升级政策的有效性研究——以广东"双转移"战略为例》,《城市发展研究》第9期。
吴敬琏,2017,《产业政策面临的问题:不是存废,而是转型》,《兰州大学学报(社会科学版)》第6期。
余明桂、范蕊、钟慧洁,2016,《中国产业政策与企业技术创新》,《中国工业经济》第12期。
俞立平、章美娇、王作功,2018,《中国地区高技术产业政策评估及影响因素研究》,《科学学研究》第1期。
岳军,2004,《公共选择理论分析框架解析》,《山东财政学院学报》第5期。
赵艳莉,2012,《公共选择理论视角下的广州市"三旧"改造解析》,《城市规划》第6期。
张维迎,2017,《产业政策争论背后的经济学问题》,《学术界》第2期。
张泽一、赵坚,2009,《产业政策有效性问题的分析》,《北京交通大学学报(社会科学版)》第3期。
Chen Z., Poncet S. and Xiong R., 2017, "Inter-industry Relatedness and Industrial-policy Efficiency:Evidence from China's Export Processing Zones", Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol.45, No.4.
Pepall L., Richards D. J. and Norman G., 2008, Industrial Organization:Contemporary Theory and Empirical Applications, Malden, M A:Blackwell Publishing Company.
Powell B., 2005, "State Development Planning:Did It Create an East Asian Miracle?" Review of Austrian Economics, Vol.18, No.3-4
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
国家社会科学基金学术期刊资助入选期刊