Journal of East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) >
Can Land Marketization Narrow the Urban-Rural Income Gap?: Empirical Evidence from 232 Prefecture-Level Cities in China
Land market reform is an important institutional variable which affects the urban-rural income gap. Using the data of 232 prefecture-level cities from 2001 to 2013, this paper empirically analyzes the impact of land marketization on the urban-rural income gap in China. It is found that land marketization significantly expands the urban-rural income gap at the national level, but there are regional differences in this impact. Land marketization in eastern China has narrowed the urban-rural income gap, while land marketization in central and western China has widened the urban-rural income gap. Therefore, from the perspective of the whole country, the land expropriation compensation mechanism shall shift from static monetary compensation to dynamic compensation, and reflect regional differences. In particular, the integration level of urban and rural land market in central and western regions should be improved. We shall also break away from the dual structure of unequal rights and interests in agricultural land and urban land, open up the urban and rural real estate market, establish a unified urban and rural land system and housing market, and promote equal rights and prices for same land. We shall properly handle with the relationship between the government and the market, reduce the government's improper interference in the allocation of land resources, balance the supply of land between regions, and encourage urban and rural residents in eastern, central and western regions to share the fruits of reform and development.
GAO Bo , FAN Xue-rui , WANG Hui-long . Can Land Marketization Narrow the Urban-Rural Income Gap?: Empirical Evidence from 232 Prefecture-Level Cities in China[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2019 , 51(1) : 140 -149 . DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2019.01.017
阿玛蒂亚·森,2001,《贫困与饥荒》,北京:商务印书馆。
常兴华、李伟,2018,《中国宏观收入分配格局再研究》,《宏观经济研究》第5期。
高波等著,2017,《我国城市住房制度改革研究——变迁、绩效与创新》,北京:经济科学出版社。
胡金星,2016,《转型升级:房地产业供给侧改革之要义》,《探索与争鸣》第5期。
蒋省三、刘守英、李青,2007,《土地制度改革与国民经济成长》,《管理世界》第9期。
李群峰,2014,《农地市场化影响城乡收入差距的门槛效应分析——基于28个省份农地流转交易数据》,《农村经济》第9期。
李实,2018,《当前中国的收入分配状况》,《学术界》第3期。
林毅夫,1994,《制度、技术与中国农业发展》,上海:上海人民出版社。
刘拥军、薛敬孝,2003,《加速农业市场化进程是增加农民收入的根本途径》,《经济学家》第1期。
刘渝琳、滕洋洋、李后建,2010,《FDI的流入必然会扩大城乡收入差距吗?》,《世界经济研究》第8期。
吕炜、高飞,2013,《城镇化、市民化与城乡收入差距——双重二元结构下市民化措施的比较与选择》,《财贸经济》第12期。
钱龙、叶俊焘,2017,《要素市场化如何影响城乡收入差距——基于省级面板数据的实证分析》,《中国农业大学学报》第7期。
托马斯·皮凯蒂,2014,《21世纪资本论》,北京:中信出版社。
王先柱、赵奉军,2013,《收入差距、挤出效应与高房价》,《经济理论与经济管理》第1期。
王艺明、蔡翔,2010,《财政支出结构与城乡收入差距——基于东、中、西部地区省级面板数据的经验分析》,《财经科学》第8期。
吴万宗、刘玉博、徐琳,2018,《产业结构变迁与收入不平等》,《管理世界》第2期。
谢冬水,2018,《土地供给干预与城乡收入差距——基于中国105个城市的面板数据》,《经济科学》第3期。
新思想·新观点·新举措编写组,2012,《新思想·新观点·新举措》,北京:学习出版社、红旗出版社。
徐升艳、陈杰、赵刚,2018,《土地出让市场化如何促进经济增长》,《中国工业经济》第3期。
杨天宇,2018,《中国居民转移性收入不平等成因的实证分析》,《中南财经政法大学学报》第1期。
杨晓军,2013,《中国农户人力资本投资与城乡收入差距:基于省级面板数据的经验分析》,《农业技术经济》第4期。
张传勇,2014,《房价波动收入分配效应的区域差异分析——基于中国省际面板数据的实证研究》,《华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》第1期。
Arruñada, B., 2012, Institutional Foundations of Impersonal Exchange:Theory and Policy of Contractual Registries, Chicago and London:University of Chicago Press.
Kuznets, S., 1955, "Economic Growth and Income Inequality", American Economic Review, Vol.45, No.1.
Lucas, R.E., 2004, "Life Earnings and Rural-Urban Migration", Journal of Political Economy, Vol.112, No.S1.
Liu, T., Cao, G., Yan, Y., et al., 2016, "Urban Land Marketization in China:Central Policy, Local Initiative, and Market Mechanism", Land Use Policy, Vol.57.
Young, A., 2013, "Inequality, the Urban-Rural Gap, and Migration", Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.128, No.4.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
国家社会科学基金学术期刊资助入选期刊