Content of ２０世纪中国社会思潮研究 in our journal

Published in last 1 year |  In last 2 years |  In last 3 years |  All Please wait a minute... For Selected: Download Citations EndNote Reference Manager ProCite BibTeX RefWorks Toggle Thumbnails Select The Revolutionary Era and the Rising of Philosophical Radicalism GAO Rui-quan Journal of East China Normal University (Philosoph    2013, 45 (6): 1-17.   Abstract （701）   HTML （13）    PDF （805KB）（1566）       Knowledge map    After a critical reflection on radicalism for 20 years, more positive discussion is in need about the Chinese radicalism in the 20th century. Radicalism, which forms a triangle with the conservatism and liberalism and serves as an instrument in analyzing the modern public intellectual history, not only shows an “attitude” or “tendency”, but also embraces some substantial theoretical “doctrine”. The social foundation for its birth can only be understood from the perspective of the social history of the “revolutionary era”. The revolution in China in the 20th century is not only political and cultural, but involves a fundamental transformation in social structure as well. The period from 1895 to 1995 has witnessed the whole “rising-declining” picture of the radicalism in the “revolutionary era”. Radicalism has political, cultural, philosophical and other dimensions. Philosophical radicalism not only provides the philosophical defense but also serves as the spiritual core for political and cultural dimensions of radicalism. The philosophical radicalism includes roughly four aspects: progressivism, the doctrine of social revolution, equalitarianism and utilitarianism. A deeper genealogical analysis is required to examine how these aspects jointly lay a philosophical foundation for radicalism. Related Articles | Metrics Select The Theoretical Characteristics and Practice of Chinese Cultural Conservatism in the 20th Century HU Feng-xiang Journal of East China Normal University (Philosoph    2013, 45 (6): 18-24.   Abstract （671）   HTML （13）    PDF （548KB）（1148）       Knowledge map    The cultural conservatism is one of the most important doctrines of cultural construction during the social transformation in China in the 20th century. Theoretically, it always insists that the construction of modern Chinese culture should be based on inheriting and transforming traditions so as to maintain the main characteristics of the nationality. In this way, the cultural conservatism is completely opposite to the cultural radicalism, which aims at “Westernization”. As a modern cultural thought, the cultural conservatism distinguishes itself from other obstinate conservatisms for its inheritance of the tradition is based on a modern self-consciousness. The performance of its representative schools such as nationalism, the Orient Culture Clique, Xueheng School and modern Confucianism shows that the contribution of the cultural conservatism mainly lies in the systematical construction of theories and modern cultural philosophy rather than in social practice, which explains well why it has been marginalized for a long time in modern society. Related Articles | Metrics Select Journal of East China Normal University (Philosoph    2010, 42 (5): 1-8.   Abstract （1716）   HTML （10）          Knowledge map    Related Articles | Metrics Select Journal of East China Normal University (Philosoph    2010, 42 (5): 9-18.   Abstract （1502）   HTML （10）          Knowledge map    Related Articles | Metrics Select Journal of East China Normal University (Philosoph    2010, 42 (5): 19-29.   Abstract （1309）   HTML （7）          Knowledge map    Related Articles | Metrics Select The Significances and Problems of Contemporary Chinese Cultural Conservatism Li Xianghai Journal of East China Normal University (Philosoph    2010, 42 (5): 30-36.   Abstract （1646）   HTML （20）          Knowledge map    The thought of contemporary Chinese cultural conservatism characterized the whole consciousness of Chinese culture’s modern development which shows a conversion focusing from “breaking” to “founding” from one aspect, and this change has its inner necessity. The positive significances are: First, it helps to further enhance the subjectivity of national culture in Chinese contemporary cultural construction, and founding on this to better absorb foreign culture especially western culture; Second, it helps to create a social cultural atmosphere to understand Chinese culture more completely and profoundly, and better critically inherit Chinese culture’s good traditions; Third, it reflects requirements of the time which must concentrate the wisdoms of multi-ethnic cultural communities to solve common puzzles of the “global village”. At the same time, there are also some disadvantages: first is the narrow cultural mentality; second are dogmatism and monism cultural view; third is its weakness in theoretical construction. Related Articles | Metrics Select Journal of East China Normal University (Philosoph    2010, 42 (5): 37-44.   Abstract （1382）   HTML （11）          Knowledge map    Related Articles | Metrics