Content of 政治哲学研究 in our journal

Published in last 1 year |  In last 2 years |  In last 3 years |  All Please wait a minute... For Selected: Download Citations EndNote Reference Manager ProCite BibTeX RefWorks Toggle Thumbnails Select Marx’s Doctrine of “Post-justice” and “China’s Road” SUN Liang Journal of East China Normal University (Philosoph    2015, 47 (4): 47-52.   DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2015.04.006 Abstract （424）   HTML （13）    PDF （1129KB）（1117）       Knowledge map    Only in the context of intellectual history can we carry forward the discussion on “Marx and justice”. From Aristotle to Scottish thinkers’ interpretation in the 17th century, distributive justice has been narrowly understood as the justice of distribution according to contribution (labor), which is required in the logic of the bourgeoisie to justify private property right. By examining this change, we find that Marx does not deny distributive justice. This requires us to understand the real connotation of “bringing one’s ability into full play and allocating according to one’s needs”. The construction of socialism with Chinese characteristics needs to deal with the tension between these two kinds of distributive justice practically and wisely, which has gradually formed a “China’s road” different from the approach of “seeking justice by combining liberalism and socialism”, “market justice” and the “third path”. Related Articles | Metrics Select On The History of the Concept of “Desert”: Concerning Its Paradigm Transformation and Discourse Domain Extension XU Feng Journal of East China Normal University (Philosoph    2015, 47 (4): 53-59.   DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2015.04.007 Abstract （451）   HTML （6）    PDF （1313KB）（1165）       Knowledge map    As an important concept in contemporary distributive justice, “desert” has a long history. “Desert” in Aristotle and other thinkers in ancient Greece is similar to “merit” in modern English, referring to public positions based on virtue. On the contrary, “desert” in modern society means the deserving primary social goods according to the action of a rational individual. The paradigm transformation from ancient “merit” to modern “deserve” is closely related to the Enlightenment. In the 20th century, further discussion has been carried out with the distinction between “desert” and “anti-desert” made by John Rawls and other thinkers. Contemporary discussion on “desert” has also extended to intergenerational desert and global desert. Related Articles | Metrics Select The Issue of the Present and the Double Dimensions of Historicism WU Guan-jun Journal of East China Normal University (Philosoph    2014, 46 (2): 47-55.   Abstract （755）   HTML （8）    PDF （592KB）（1418）       Knowledge map    Taking the recent heated debate on China’s particularities among Chinese scholars as its starting point, this paper endeavors to tackle the issues of the present and particularism at a philosophical level. It consists of four parts. Firstly, the paper addresses the question why the present matters significantly to sociopolitical deliberations. Then it moves on in discussing the inner ambiguities of Hegel’s historicism, and the problems of Leo Strauss’s anti-historicist thesis. The last section of the paper proposes a dialectics between the particular and the universal, and argues that once (re)viewing the “China model” topic from the perspective of the Foucauldian “ontology of the present” as critical ontology, participants of this current debate will be able to free themselves from the factionalist opposition between “Rightists” and “Leftists”, and turn the debate into a more productive one. Related Articles | Metrics Select International Relations, Morality and Moralism: An Ethical Examination of Realism REN Jun Journal of East China Normal University (Philosoph    2014, 46 (2): 56-63.   Abstract （879）   HTML （7）    PDF （525KB）（1582）       Knowledge map    In Western theories of international relations, realism is an important tradition. The relation between the theory of global justice and realism is an issue that political philosophers have to treat seriously. On the one hand, we should clarify that morality is relevant to international relations and criticize the strong version of realism in order to pave the way for the theory of global justice. On the other hand, we should notice that it is not morality but moralism that contemporary mainstream realism represented by Hans Morgenthau rejects. In this sense, the theory of global justice seems compatible with temperate versions of realism. They present two indispensable perspectives for the normative study of international relations. Related Articles | Metrics