Content of 中国小说史研究 in our journal

Published in last 1 year |  In last 2 years |  In last 3 years |  All Please wait a minute... For Selected: Download Citations EndNote Reference Manager ProCite BibTeX RefWorks Toggle Thumbnails Select The Significance of Advertisements for the Research of Modern Novels CHEN Da-Kang Journal of East China Normal University (Philosoph    2015, 47 (5): 190-201.   DOI: １０．１６３８２／ｊ．ｃｎｋｉ．１０００--５５７９．２０１５．０５．０１９ Abstract （246）   HTML （5）    PDF （2578KB）（981）       Knowledge map    There are thousands of advertisements for novels in modern newspapers and journals， from which we can obtain the information about disappeared works or special issues of novels， figure out the time of their publication or literary events， examine the interaction between authors， publishers and readers， and then comprehensively analyze and depict the complete picture of unknown literary events or their development. Because traditional analyses of authors and works cannot solve the abovementioned issues， the thousands of advertisements at that time provide great support for the research of modern novels. Related Articles | Metrics Select On the Confusion of Fictions and Unofficial Historical Records WANG Qing-Hua Journal of East China Normal University (Philosoph    2015, 47 (5): 202-207.   DOI: １０．１６３８２／ｊ．ｃｎｋｉ．１０００--５５７９．２０１５．０５．０２０ Abstract （372）   HTML （4）    PDF （1462KB）（887）       Knowledge map    The establishment of the conception of fiction experienced three main stages respectively represented by “The Records of Art and Literature” in The Historical Records， “The Records of Classics and Books” in The History of Sui and “The Records of Art and Literature” in The New History of Tang. In this process， fiction， as a conception of a literary genre， also changed from “the end of philosophical writings” to “the rest of historical records”. Thus， “fiction” inclines to be confused with both “biography” and “unofficial historical record”. Relatively speaking， its more likely to be confused with the category of biography. The confusion between fictions and unofficial historical records is mainly about the mixed records in public and private book lists in successive dynasties and the confusion between the contents of the two kinds of works. This confusion is resulted from the fact that they are both different from official history and they both record hearsay and anecdotes of historical figures. The difference between them lies in the fact that fictions are too detailed about the anecdotes and unrelated with politics， military and the concept of good and evil which historians are interested in. Related Articles | Metrics