Content of 法国哲学研究 in our journal

Published in last 1 year |  In last 2 years |  In last 3 years |  All Please wait a minute... For Selected: Download Citations EndNote Reference Manager ProCite BibTeX RefWorks Toggle Thumbnails Select The resemblance or the representation?--A research for getting out of the classical disposition of "cogito" TANG Ming-Jie Journal of East China Normal University (Philosoph    2015, 47 (6): 82-88.   DOI: 10.16982/j.cnki.1000-5579.2015.06.010 Abstract （517）   HTML （21）    PDF （601KB）（816）       Knowledge map    Foucault's The ordre of things is usually considered as a structuralism work, because it profoundly denied the dominant fundament of cogito Cartesian. Through the investigation and the comparison of two periods of the Renaissance and the classic, considering the different roles of cogito in the tension between words and things, the critique foucauldian does not aim to deny the cognitive subject, but to reveal the space of experience constituted in the level of cogito, which is mixed with the representation and the thing. This space loses not only the variety of the world but also the complicity of man. In the classical period, it reflects neither man nor world, but a utopian of language, it’s an inheritance and lost of the resemblance. And to get out of this disposition, we must carry out a kind of "askêsis" style of "cogito". Related Articles | Metrics Select Freedom is For-Itself——A Ignored Perspective of Sartre’s Phenomenological Ontology QU Ming-Zhen Journal of East China Normal University (Philosoph    2015, 47 (6): 89-97.   DOI: 10.16982/j.cnki.1000-5579.2015.06.011 Abstract （579）   HTML （17）    PDF （531KB）（1050）       Knowledge map    In Being and Nothingness, Sartre returned to the problem of ontology by the way of phenomenology, which is about being. He considered that the problem of being did not mean ‘being is being’, which was the basical and esscencial being of all the beings ,but it was ‘ the being of the appearance’, which was the existent way of the phenomenon and how it appeared. That is his special phenomenology. Sartre’s phenomenological ontology is deferent from the traditional one, because it is both phenomenological and ontological, which is the ontology as phenomenology. Sartre difererated two types of being in the phenomenological transform of traditional ontology, namely, the in-itself and for-itself. The in-itself is ‘being what it is’, while the for-itself is ‘being what it is not and not being what it is’. There is the significance or ability of nihilation in the ontological structure of the for-itself , which can make the being what it is to be the being what it is not, or the being what it is not to be the being what it is, and it comes from the original conscious as ‘nothingness’. The original conscious as ‘nothingness’ is the foundation that makes the for-itself pretence to self and the internal negation possible, and it can make the in-itself revealed and make two independent regions between the in-itself and for-itself can communicate. Above all ,it is the ontological source of the absolute freedom of the for-itself. Related Articles | Metrics