华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2000, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 3-10.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2000.05.001

• 政治 哲学 •    下一篇

皮亚杰发生认识论若干问题再思考

李其维1, 弗内歇2   

  1. 1华东师范大学心理学系, 上海 200062
    2瑞士日内瓦大学心理学系
  • 收稿日期:2000-06-23 出版日期:2000-09-15 发布日期:2026-03-11

The Reconsideration of Some Questions about Piaget's Genetic Epistemology

Qi-wei LI1, J. Vonèche2   

  • Received:2000-06-23 Online:2000-09-15 Published:2026-03-11

摘要:

发生认识论的主题没有过时, 而且永不会过时, 皮亚杰为发生认识论开创的研究路线——康德意义上的范畴之个体发生的研究应该坚持。发生认识论中的一些重大问题, 如皮亚杰结构论与其池结构主义者的结构论的关系; 心理逻辑不同于形式逻辑的本质; “趋同重构”概念面临还原论的危险; “水平滞差”与“阶段”概念之间的固有冲突等, 仍需进一步探讨和澄明。当今日内瓦的某些心理学家们的兴趣向“现实主体”的转换在某种程度上离开了皮亚杰的传统。目前, 一方面皮亚杰的整个理论体系期待着新的理论综合; 另一方面也存在与当代认知心理学进行有别于现今“新皮亚杰学派”的合作, 特别是汲取后者实验方法和技巧之长处的必要性。

关键词: 皮亚杰, 发生认识论, 结构论, 心理逻辑学, 新皮亚杰学派

Abstract:

In the study of genetic epistemology the line of studying categories in the Kantian sense, which originated from Piaget, should be held. Those subject matters of genetic epistemology put forward by Piaget have not yet been out-of-date and will never be. Some important questions in genetic epistemology, such as the relationship between Piaget's structuralism and others'structuralism, the nature of psycho-logic, reductionistic dangers of "the convergent reconstruction with overtakings, inherent conflicts between the two concepts of "horizontal decalage" and "stage", etc., are still open to discussion. The fact that some psychologists in Geneva are shifting their interests to "the study of real subjects signifies, to a certain extent, a departure from Piaget's tradition. There is a possibility of combining genetic epistemology with contemporary cognitive psychology, especially in the use of experimental methods, and also there is a necessity of a further new synthesis for Piaget's categories and concepts.

Key words: Piaget, genetic epistemology, structuralism, psycho-logic, Neo-Piagetian School