华东师范大学(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (1): 40-45.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2017.01.005

• 哲学与文化 • 上一篇    下一篇

休谟之问与思想治疗

王习胜   

  1. 安徽师范大学马克思主义研究中心, 安徽芜湖, 241003
  • 出版日期:2017-01-13 发布日期:2017-02-18
  • 作者简介:王习胜,安徽师范大学马克思主义研究中心教授,博士生导师(安徽芜湖,241003)。
  • 基金资助:

    国家哲学社会科学基金重点项目“思想政治教育人文关怀的理论与方法研究”（项目编号：13AKS013）。

Hume's Question and Thought Treatment

WANG Xi-sheng   

  • Online:2017-01-13 Published:2017-02-18
  • About author:Wang Xi-sheng

RichHTML

9

PDF

511

摘要：

“是”或“不是”变换为“应该”或“不应该”何以可能，休谟质疑其中的可能性和合理性，学界给出了“应该的逻辑”之学理解答；面对求助者“应该”如何的思想困惑，哲学咨商者主张回归事实之“是”，给出了“实践三段论”的思想治疗模式。融合由“是”导出“应该”的正向解答与由“应该”回溯“是”的逆向探索之视域，贯通理论研究与实践应用的辅成关联，可以深化休谟之问的学理理解，也将利于学术智慧应用于日常生活，照护众生的心灵家园。

关键词: 休谟之问, 思想治疗, "是"与"应该", 思想咨商, 逻辑基础疗法

Abstract:

David Hume doubts the possibility and validity of inferring from "is" to "ought to". While the academic circle gives a theoretical answer of the logic of "ought to", philosophical counselors provide the thought treatment mode of "a practical syllogism" starting from "is" when facing the perplexity of "ought to". We should combine the forward approach of inferring from "is" to "ought to" and the inverse one of tracing from "ought to" back to "is", and integrate theoretical research and practical application so as to get a deeper theoretical understanding of Hume's question on the one hand, and apply academic wisdom in daily life and the care of the mind of common people on the other.

Key words: Hume's question, thought treatment, "is", and "ought to", thought counseling, logic primary therapy