华东师范大学(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (3): 51-58.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2019.03.005

• 冯契哲学思想研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

解决狭义认识论问题的别样方案

刘静芳   

  1. 上海财经大学人文学院 上海, 200433
  • 出版日期:2019-05-15 发布日期:2019-05-22
  • 作者简介:刘静芳,上海财经大学人文学院教授(上海,200433)。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金项目"中国传统知论的现代审视研究"(项目编号:15BZX066)。

Different Solutions to the Problems of “Narrow Epistemology”

LIU Jing-fang   

  • Online:2019-05-15 Published:2019-05-22

摘要: 受"中国哲学逻辑与认识论意识不发达"这一观点的刺激,20世纪中国哲学家如张东荪、金岳霖、冯契等,特别重视认识论问题的研究。他们的贡献,不仅在于探索了一条认识论研究的"形上进路",还在于对西方认识论所关注的"狭义认识论"问题,提出了不同的解决方案。他们承认感觉的局限性,却另辟途径沟通天人、主客;承认范畴的重要作用,却致力于阐发不同的范畴体系;承认逻辑的重要性,却为认识论奠定了不同的"逻辑基础"。这些解决狭义认识论问题的新路向,是20世纪中国认识论研究的重要贡献。

关键词: 中国近现代认识论, “自然界”的扩展, 中国哲学范畴体系, 认识论的逻辑基础

Abstract: Stimulated by the view that the consciousness of logic and epistemology was underdeveloped in traditional Chinese philosophy, some Chinese philosophers in the 20th century such as ZHANG Dong-sun, JIN Yue-lin and FENG Qi paid much attention to the study of epistemology. Their contribution lies not only in exploring a "metaphysical approach" to epistemology, but also in finding new solutions to the problems of "the narrow epistemology", which has been the main concern of modern Western philosophy. They acknowledge the limitations of sensation but try to find other ways of connecting nature and man, subject and object; they acknowledge the importance of category but try to expound different category systems; they acknowledge the importance of logic but try to expand the "logical foundation" of epistemology. These new solutions to the problems of "narrow epistemology" have been important accomplishments of Chinese epistemology in the 20th century.

Key words: modern Chinese epistemology, the expansion of “the realm of nature”, the category system of Chinese philosophy, the logical foundation of epistemology