华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2023, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (2): 122-132.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2023.02.011

• 节日文化与乡村振兴 • 上一篇    

当代乡村亲属关系的节日实践——以一个鲁西南家庭的春节为例

王均霞   

  • 接受日期:2023-02-24 出版日期:2023-03-15 发布日期:2023-03-24
  • 作者简介:王均霞,华东师范大学民俗学研究所副研究员(上海,200241)

The Kinship Practices at Festivals in Contemporary Rural Areas:A Case Study of a Rural Family in Southwest Shangdong at the Spring Festival

Jun-xia WANG   

  • Accepted:2023-02-24 Online:2023-03-15 Published:2023-03-24

摘要:

在现代化进程中,阶层与地域意义上的双重流动性使得过去偏向同质性的乡村亲属关系群体内部日趋走向异质性,这种异质性深刻影响着当下乡村亲属关系实践。借由自我民族志的研究方法,从局内人视角深描具体的人及其家庭在春节期间的亲属关系实践,一定程度上可以发现现代化进程中乡村亲属关系实践的逻辑。整体而言,当下传统亲属关系维系习俗既被执着地固守着,又被快速地改变着。对习俗的固守是因为父辈和子辈仍然分享了一个经由频繁的面对面互动而织就的共同的过去,在这个过去中,父权式的亲属关系实践模式被内化成人们认知的一部分,父辈仍然象征性地实践对子辈的传统权威。改变则由两方面的原因造成:一方面,非农化的工作时间约束与生活空间的远隔,使得亲属之间面对面的互动交流频率与时长大为减少,亲属关系网络内部共同的生活经验及蕴含其中的亲密感日趋稀薄,习俗实践的情感动力日趋匮乏;另一方面,子辈日益走进以其自我与核心家庭为中心的个体化进程中。在以自我及其核心家庭为中心的利弊权衡中,亲属关系维系的重要性日趋减弱。在固守与改变两种力量的角力过程中,今天的乡村亲属关系网络日益走向松弛。

关键词: 自我民族志, 流动性, 异质性, 亲属关系实践

Abstract:

In the process of modernization, people’s dual mobilities in class and region have made the homogenous kinship group become more and more heterogeneous, which has been profoundly influencing rural kinship practices nowadays. With the method of autoethnography, this paper tries to explore the logic of rural kinship practice in the process of modernization from the perspective of insiders to describe the kinship practice of a special individual as well as his or her family at the Spring Festival. Generally speaking, the custom of traditional kinship is inherited firmly on the one hand and is changed quickly on the other. The inheritance of the custom is due to the fact the youth generation and their parent generation share a common past with frequent face-to-face interaction. In this common past, the patriarchal kinship practice mode has been internalized as a part of the youth’s recognition, and the parent generation is still symbolically owning traditional authority to the youth. The change has been caused by two elements. First, the constraint of non-agricultural working time and the separated living space make the frequency and duration of face-to-face interaction between relatives greatly reduced, and the common life experience within the kinship network as well as the intimacy in the experience is becoming thinner and thinner, and the emotional power of the custom practice is becoming scarcer. Second, the youth are gradually in the process of individualization which focuses on themselves and their nuclear families, and the significance of kinship relation maintaining is weakening. With the struggle between inheritance and change, rural kinship network is increasingly lax today.

Key words: autoethnography, mobility, heterogeneity, kinship practice