华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2023, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (5): 108-117.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2023.05.011

• 法学研究 • 上一篇    

互联网法院审理行政案件的实践样态与功能实现

翟翌, 刘杰   

  • 出版日期:2023-09-15 发布日期:2023-09-28
  • 作者简介:翟翌,重庆大学法学院教授(重庆,401331)|刘杰,重庆大学法学院博士研究生
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金青年项目“行政特许基础理论研究”(项目编号:18CFX023);重庆市社会科学规划英才计划项目“行政法视野下中国高校教师聘任改革的理论与制度研究”(项目编号:2022YC073);中央高校基本科研业务费项目“行政法治视阈下我国高校教师聘用制改革研究”(项目编号:2021CDJSKJC32);中央高校基本科研业务费项目“川渝毗连地区人才政策一体化研究暨人类命运共同体视野下我国宪法与国际法交融的理论与实践研究”(项目编号:2022CDJSKZX02)

The Practice Pattern and Function Realization of Internet Courts in Trying Administrative Cases

Yi ZHAI, Jie LIU   

  • Online:2023-09-15 Published:2023-09-28

摘要:

互联网法院的设立是大势所趋,它与建设网络强国、法治国家重大战略举措内涵一致。在法院信息化建设的背景下,为了进一步彰显互联网法院的核心价值,应强化其探索涉网案件诉讼规则之功能定位。目前,互联网法院在探索民事领域诉讼规则方面已有较多尝试,但在行政诉讼领域,却鲜见涉网案件诉讼规则的创制。部分涉网行政案件属于互联网法院受案范围,但由于司法解释列举的范围有限,司法实践呈现出实质审理案件少、案件类型单一化、上诉率高、裁判标准不统一的样态,这些因素直接或间接影响了互联网法院在探索涉网行政案件诉讼规则方面的成效。从制度设计和实践运行层面分析,未来应进一步扩大互联网法院受理的行政案件范围,完善相关配套体制机制,并赋予行政相对人程序选择权以跨越其与行政机关间可能存在的数字鸿沟,以进一步实现互联网法院的功能定位。

关键词: 互联网法院, 行政案件, 功能定位, 实践样态, 路径展开

Abstract:

The establishment of Internet courts is the trend of the Internet era, which is consistent with the major strategic initiatives to build cyber power and legal state. Under the macro background of the current court informatization construction, in order to highlight the core value of Internet courts, we should further strengthen its functional positioning of exploring new rules of judicial governance in the Internet field. Internet courts have explored many new rules in the field of civil litigation, but there are few new rules in the field of administrative litigation. Some Internet-related administrative cases belong to the scope of Internet courts, but the scope of judicial interpretation is limited, and in judicial practice, there are few substantive trial cases, a single type of cases, a high rate of appeal, and inconsistent judgment standards. These factors directly or indirectly affect the effectiveness of Internet courts in exploring the litigation rules of administrative cases involving the Internet. From the perspective of system design and practical operation, we should further expand the scope of administrative cases heard by Internet courts in the future, improve relevant supporting system rules, and give administrative counterparts the right to choose procedures to bridge the possible digital gap between them and administrative organs to further realize the functional positioning of Internet courts.

Key words: Internet court, administrative cases, functional positioning, practice pattern, path