华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (1): 101-112.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2024.01.010

• 中国式现代化与法治建设 • 上一篇    

新经济法律治理中的地方实验

段礼乐   

  • 接受日期:2023-12-19 出版日期:2024-01-15 发布日期:2024-01-29
  • 作者简介:段礼乐,深圳大学法学院副教授(深圳,518060)
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金青年项目“共享经济法律规制的司法路径研究”(项目编号:19CFX065)

Local Experiments in Legal Governance of the New Economy

Liyue Duan   

  • Accepted:2023-12-19 Online:2024-01-15 Published:2024-01-29

摘要:

新经济带来法律结构的变化、权利关系的调整,但并不必然降低交易成本,缓解信息不对称。新经济的创新发展引发了新的法律回应,以共享经济某些领域的法律规制为例,当前的规制并没有取得预期的制度效果,产业发展的规律、法律问题的识别、规制方案的提出、规制能力的塑造都会影响新经济的规制效果。基于我国的央地关系及地方竞争格局,可以在新经济治理中采用地方实验的治理路径。地方实验不仅局限于立法层面,还可以发挥地方司法机关的能动性,在新经济案件的裁判中,通过个案生成法律规则。对于地方实验的潜在弊端,可以通过统一大市场建设的政策引导、公平竞争审查的制度约束、新经济治理工具的范围限定等方式加以矫正。

关键词: 新经济, 共享经济, 法律治理, 地方实验

Abstract:

The new economy brings about the change of legal structure and the adjustment of rights relations, and does not necessarily reduce transaction costs and alleviate information asymmetry. The innovative development of the new economy requires new legal regulations. Taking the legal regulation of the sharing economy as an example, this paper finds that the current regulation has not achieved the expected institutional effect, and the model of industrial development, the identification of legal problems, the proposal of regulatory schemes, and the shaping of regulatory capacity will all affect the regulatory effect of the new economy. Based on the central-local relationship and local competition in China, we can adopt the governance path of local experiment in the field of new economic governance. Local experiments are not only limited to local legislation, but also can generate legal rules through individual cases in the judgment of new economic cases. The potential drawbacks of local experiments can be corrected by the policy guidance of unified market construction, the institutional constraints of fair competition review, and the scope limitation of new economic governance tools.

Key words: new economy, sharing economy, legal governance, local experiments