华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (2): 23-35.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2026.02.003

• 冯契哲学思想研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

冯契语言哲学思想探微

彭传华, 林合华   

  • 接受日期:2026-02-11 出版日期:2026-03-15 发布日期:2026-03-31
  • 作者简介:彭传华,浙江师范大学马克思主义学院、人文高等研究院教授(金华,321000)
    林合华,南京中医药大学马克思主义学院副教授(南京,210023)
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金重大项目“中国语言哲学史(多卷本)”(项目编号:18ZDA019);国家社科基金后期资助一般项目“20世纪中国哲学中的形上直觉问题研究”(项目编号:22FZXB030)。

On Feng Qi’s Philosophy of Language

Chuanhua Peng, Hehua Lin   

  • Accepted:2026-02-11 Online:2026-03-15 Published:2026-03-31

摘要:

冯契的语言哲学思想以其“智慧说”体系为框架,在广义认识论视域下系统探讨了语言的本质、特性、功用以及语言与思维、现实的关系,并对“超名言之域”的言说问题作出了创造性回应。冯契融合金岳霖的语言工具论与马克思主义实践观,既强调语言作为概念摹写与规范所与的认知功能,又指出其作为人类的一种物质的、历史的社会实践活动。在语言与思维的关系问题上,他区分理论思维与形象思维,揭示语言在抽象表达与意味传递中的双重作用;在语言与现实的关系上,坚持唯物主义立场,主张语言作为思想的物质外壳间接反映客观实在。针对“超名言之域”,冯契提出“即表即遮”的“玄言”与“辩证的综合”的言说方式,继承并发展了金岳霖及中国传统哲学的相关思想。其理论贡献在于贯通古今中西哲学资源,既丰富了中国语言哲学的思想意蕴,亦具有世界哲学的意义;其相关思想亦存在对表达的实践层面关注不足等局限。

关键词: 冯契, 语言哲学, 超名言之域, 玄言, 辩证的综合

Abstract:

Within his “doctrine of wisdom” and from the perspective of a broad epistemology, Feng Qi’s philosophy of language systematically explores the nature, characteristics, and functions of language, as well as its relationship to thought and reality, and offers a creative response to the issue of how to express the ineffable. Integrating Jin Yuelin’s instrumentalism of language with the Marxist view of practice, Feng emphasizes the cognitive function of language by both describing and prescribing the given. He also stresses its nature as a material, historical, and social practice of humankind. Regarding the relationship between language and thought, he distinguishes theoretical thinking from imaginative thinking, revealing the dual role of language in abstract expression and flavor transmission. On the relationship between language and reality, he maintains a materialist stance, asserting that language, as the material form of thought, indirectly reflects objective reality. Concerning the ineffable, Feng advances both “mysterious speech” characterized by the combination of manifestation and concealment and “dialectical synthesis” as the modes of expression, thereby inheriting and further developing ideas from Jin Yuelin and traditional Chinese philosophy. His theoretical contribution lies in bridging philosophical resources from both Chinese and Western traditions, enriching the intellectual connotations of Chinese philosophy of language while bearing significance for world philosophy. Nonetheless, his thought exhibits certain limitations, such as insufficient attention to the practical dimension of linguistic expression.

Key words: Feng Qi, philosophy of language, the ineffable, mysterious speech, dialectical synthesis