华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (4): 7-19.doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2026.04.002

• 重启科技与人文对话 • 上一篇    下一篇

论作为新兴权利的神经权利

于浩   

  • 接受日期:2026-06-21 出版日期:2026-07-15 发布日期:2026-08-03
  • 作者简介:于浩,华东师范大学法学院教授(上海,200241)
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金重大项目“当代中国国家治理中的规范协同问题研究”(项目编号:19ZDA155)。

On Neurorights as an Emerging Category of Rights

Hao Yu   

  • Accepted:2026-06-21 Online:2026-07-15 Published:2026-08-03

摘要:

以脑机接口为代表的神经技术正在打破头骨之内不可触及的传统假定。现有基本权利谱系在思想读取、精神操控等方面暴露出制度真空。神经权利是以维护人脑尊严和精神自主为核心,由人格同一性权、精神完整权、认知自由权及精神隐私权构成的复合性新兴权利,并归入基本权利的范畴。在我国,可通过确认精神完整和精神隐私的宪法价值、将神经数据纳入敏感个人信息范畴、严禁实施强制性神经干预,并辅之以神经科技伦理审查和产品准入制度,逐步织就保护公民神经权利的多层次本土化规范网络。

关键词: 神经权利, 认知自由, 精神隐私, 人格同一性

Abstract:

Neurotechnologies represented by brain-computer interfaces are challenging the traditional assumption that the interior of the human skull is an untouchable domain. The existing system of fundamental rights reveals an institutional vacuum in areas such as thought-reading and mental manipulation. Neurorights, centered on protecting human cerebral dignity and mental autonomy, form an emerging composite category of fundamental rights encompassing the right to personal identity, the right to mental integrity, cognitive liberty, and mental privacy. In China, a multilayered and localized normative framework for the protection of citizens’ neurorights can be gradually developed by recognizing the constitutional value of mental integrity and mental privacy, incorporating neural data into the category of sensitive personal information, strictly prohibiting the implementation of mandatory neural interventions, and supplementing these measures with ethics review mechanisms for neurotechnologies and product market-access systems.

Key words: neurorights, cognitive liberty, mental privacy, personal identity