华东师范大学(哲学社会科学版) ›› 2012, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (2): 64-68.

• 政治学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

民主政治与激情
——论墨菲对协商民主理论的批判

郑琪   

  1. 华东师范大学人文社会科学院法律系, 上海, 200241
  • 出版日期:2012-03-15 发布日期:2012-03-29
  • 通讯作者: 郑琪
  • 作者简介:郑琪

Democratic Politics and Passion
 ——On Chantal Mouffe’s Critique of Deliberative Democracy

ZHENG Qi   

  • Online:2012-03-15 Published:2012-03-29
  • Contact: ZHENG Qi
  • About author: ZHENG Qi

摘要: 今年来,国内学术界非常关注“协商民主”的理论并对其持较为普遍的乐观态度。但是,我们在确认某一理论对现实是否有益之前,首先要思考它是否合理。为此,对墨菲的竞争性多元主义的民主模式的介绍应该能引起国内学术界对协商民主理论所面临的挑战及其存在的问题的关注。墨菲以施米特的政治理论为基础,对罗尔斯等人倡导的协商民主理论作了辩驳。与协商民主理论不同,墨菲论证了民主政治的冲突性内涵以及激情对公民的民主政治精神培养的重要作用。

关键词: 民主政治, 激情, 协商民主, 墨菲, 施米特

Abstract: There has been a huge amount of interest in the theory of deliberative democracy in China in recent years. Scholars generally hold an optimistic attitude towards it. Nevertheless, before determining whether a theory is beneficial, it is needed to decide whether the theory is reasonable in itself. The introduction of Chantal Mouffe’s democratic model of agonistic pluralism may be helpful to reflect challenges or problems that the theory of deliberative democracy faces. On the basis of Carl Schmitt’s political theory, Mouffe criticizes deliberative democracy that is proposed by Rawls and other liberals. Different from deliberative democracy, Mouffe argues for the antagonistic nature of democratic politics and the importance of passion in cultivating citizens.